Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Southern District of New York Dismisses Securities Law Claims on Grounds of International Comity; No Chapter 15 Proceeding Required
    2019-03-25

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    Kelly E. Porcelli
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    You’ve Got Contract: An Email Establishes Binding Settlement in the Second Circuit
    2018-08-09

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Rama Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Courts Have the Flexibility to Select Valuation Date in Cram Down Scenario; Fifth Circuit Remands to Bankruptcy Court for Re-valuation Based On Improper Deduction of Waived Fees
    2018-04-30

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Kelly E. Porcelli
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Another Circuit Holds that There is a Broad Right to Intervene in Adversary Proceedings
    2017-10-31

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently overturned its own prior guidance to hold that an official creditors’ committee had an unconditional statutory right to intervene in an adversary proceeding. The First Circuit joined the Second and Third Circuits to recognize that the right to intervene provided by the Bankruptcy Code is not limited to the main bankruptcy case, contrary to the long-standing rule in the Fifth Circuit. However, the First Circuit also held that the scope of intervention may be qualified, with limits set by the trial court on a case-by-case basis.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, First Circuit
    Authors:
    Stephen D. Zide , Andrew M. Dove
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    California Court Upholds Expansive Definition of Recoupment
    2017-07-11

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, California, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Medicaid, Ninth Circuit, US District Court for Central District of California
    Authors:
    Priya K. Baranpuria
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Minnesota Appeals Court Addresses Accounting for Trustee’s Fees and Expenses
    2017-04-28

    In a short decision, In re that Certain Indenture Date as of April 1, 2010 (MN Ct. App. April 3, 2017), the Court of Appeals of Minnesota recently addressed a challenge to the award of trustee fees and legal expenses brought by a municipal bondholder.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Abbe L. Dienstag
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Bankruptcy Court Permission Required to Sue UCC Members
    2016-12-21

    In a recent case arising out of the bankruptcy of the Yellowstone Mountain Club, a private ski club for the ultrawealthy, Blixseth v. Brown (In re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC) (9th Cir. Nov. 28, 2016), the Ninth Circuit held that plaintiff needed the bankruptcy court’s permission to bring post-petition claims against the chair of Yellowstone’s Unsecured Creditors Committee (“UCC”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Nathan Hyman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    The Un-Section 316(b): The Different World of Individual Rights Under Credit Agreements
    2016-05-31

    With the current interest being focused on Section 316(b) of the Trust Indenture Act, this may be a good time to examine the differing rights of noteholders under an indenture governed by the TIA and the rights of lenders under credit agreements governed by New York law.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Interest, Debt
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Stay here – Second Circuit in Residential Capital holds automatic stay can be applied to non-debtors where action has an immediate adverse economic consequence for estate
    2013-08-21

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Mortgage-backed security, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Second Circuit, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Benjamin C. Wolf
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    When a hospital becomes a no standing zone
    2011-11-10

    Bottom Line:

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina in In re Barnwell County Hospital, No. 11-06207 (Bankr. D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2011) held that anad hoc community group of citizens formed for the purpose of attempting to keep the Barnwell County hospital open and operating in its current location (the “Community Group”) was not a party-in-interest in the hospital’s bankruptcy case and so lacked standing to challenge the debtor’s eligibility for relief under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, South Carolina, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Standing (law), Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 24
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Current page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days