Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    The Rule in Gibbs - An End to Creditor Protection?
    2019-01-30

    What Is the "Rule in Gibbs"?

    The rule in Gibbs is a long-established common law principle in which the Court of Appeal determined that a debt governed by English law cannot be discharged or compromised by a foreign insolvency proceeding(Anthony Gibbs and Sons v La Société Industrielle et Commerciale des Métaux (1890) 25 QBD 399). The rule in Gibbs remains a fundamental tenet of English insolvency law.

    Why Does the Rule in Gibbs Matter?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Authors:
    Kumar Tewari
    Location:
    United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    The impact of Philadelphia Newspapers on Chapter 11 asset sales
    2010-03-29

    On March 22, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision that could significantly impact the rights of secured creditors to credit bid in connection with Chapter 11 asset sales under a plan of reorganization.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Dissenting opinion, Secured creditor, Leverage (finance), Secured loan, Chief executive officer, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Authors:
    Noah Heller , David S. Kravitz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    CFTC creates separate bankruptcy account class for cleared otc derivatives
    2010-04-02

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has amended its bankruptcy rules (17 C.F.R. Part 190) to create a new “account class” for cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives for purposes of calculating customer “net equity” and “allowed net equity” in the event of the bankruptcy of a futures commission merchant.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Clearing (finance), Collateral (finance), Futures contract, Commodity broker, Over-the-counter (finance), US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Commodity Exchange Act 1936 (USA), Code of Federal Regulations
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    FDIC sells equity interest in loans
    2010-04-09

    On April 1, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) closed the sale of an equity interest in a limited liability company (LLC) created to hold certain assets transferred from 19 failed bank receiverships. The purchaser of the interest in the Multibank Structured Transaction Single Family Residential 2010-1 is Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation (Roundpoint). The sale was the result of a competitive auction held on February 24.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Securitization & Structured Finance, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Share (finance), Collateral (finance), Interest, Limited liability company, Mortgage loan, Leverage (finance), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Authors:
    Christina J. Grigorian
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Judge overseeing Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases issues decision on setoff in bankruptcy and directs Swedbank AB to surrender post-petition deposits
    2010-05-14

    On May 5, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy case of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc issued an opinion refusing Swedbank AB's request to keep several million dollars in post-bankruptcy Lehman deposits as a setoff against pre-bankruptcy swap termination claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Debt, Lehman Brothers cases, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Motion to dismiss Lehman-related securities class action denied
    2010-05-28

    Judge John Koeltl in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York recently denied a motion to dismiss a securities class action arising, in part, from the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy filing.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Class action, Maturity (finance), Involuntary dismissal, Lehman Brothers cases, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Verizon Communications, Lehman Brothers, Securities Exchange Act 1934 (USA), US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Illinois appeal courts affirm mortgagee's right to appointment of a receiver
    2010-08-06

    Introduction
    108 N State
    Olde Prairie case
    Comment


    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Retail, Leasehold estate, Limited liability company, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Default (finance), Bank of America
    Authors:
    Kenneth M. Jacobson , Devan H. Popat
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    CFTC amends rule regarding operation of commodity brokers in bankruptcy
    2010-07-30

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has announced that it will amend its Regulation 190.04(d)(2) regarding the operation of a commodity broker in bankruptcy. Currently, a bankruptcy trustee is prohibited, immediately upon the commencement of the commodity broker’s bankruptcy case, from processing any new trades on behalf of customers of the commodity broker, with limited exceptions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Federal Register, Commodity, Commodity broker, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Treasury issues final consultation on investment firms insolvency arrangements
    2010-09-17

    On September 16, HM Treasury published its third consultation on new insolvency arrangements for investment firms. The consultation sets out the government’s final proposals for a special administration regime (SAR) for investment firms.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Public consultations, Investment banking, Investment company, HM Treasury (UK)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Clawback of fraudulent transfers from investors—“good faith” defense update
    2010-09-30

    Given the overarching Madoff Ponzi scheme as well as other mini-Madoff schemes that surfaced in its wake, many have been following issues arising from the ability of a trustee to claw back transfers (either as preferential or as fraudulent transfers) from investors who redeemed their interests in a private investment fund or managed account that turned out to be a Ponzi scheme. The law generally provides that an investor’s principal investment is protected so long as it is received in good faith and for value.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Fraud, Statute of limitations, Limited liability company, Hedge funds, Legal burden of proof, Good faith, Investment funds, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Anthony L. Paccione
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Current page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days