Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Oversecured creditor entitled to default interest if collateral sold under Section 363(b)
    2008-10-22

    An oversecured creditor’s right to interest, fees, and related charges as part of its allowed secured claim in a bankruptcy case is well established in U.S. bankruptcy law.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Interest, Default (finance), Secured loan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Protecting the attorney-client privilege in corporate families
    2008-02-01

    The importance and practical benefits resulting from the use of the same in-house counsel for an entire corporate family are numerous. For example, the in-house attorneys are particularly familiar with the corporate family’s structure, can assist with joint public filings, and can expertly oversee the corporate family’s compliance with regulatory regimes. If a subsidiary in the corporate family becomes financially distressed, however, the creditors of the financially distressed entity may look to the parent corporation for recourse.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fiduciary, Attorney-client privilege, Discovery, Misrepresentation, Motion to compel, Estoppel, Subsidiary, Bell Canada, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Parties other than landlords have standing to prevent assignment of a tenant's lease in bankruptcy
    2007-07-02

    When a retail business becomes a debtor in bankruptcy, it often decides to trim its operations by closing some of its retail stores. This strategy inevitably leaves the debtor with unnecessary leases. Instead of simply rejecting the leases, retail debtors often assume the agreements and assign them to other entities. The assumption and assignment of the unnecessary leases may allow a debtor to avoid potentially significant rejection damage claims from landlords.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Retail, Debtor, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Covenant (law), Standing (law), Legal burden of proof, Default (finance), Investment company, Walgreens, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Chapter 11 plan payment of official committee members’ legal fees disallowed absent showing of substantial contribution
    2014-05-28

    In the March/April 2014 issue of Business Restructuring Review, we discussed a recent trend among bankruptcy courts in the Southern District of New York confirming chapter 11 plans containing provisions that treat the fees and expenses of unofficial committees or individual official committee members as administrative expenses without the need to demonstrate that the applicants made a “substantial contribution” to the estate, as required by sections 503(b)(3)(D) and 503(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code. See, e.g., In re AMR Corp., 497 B.R. 690 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Business restructuring review
    2014-02-04

    THE YEAR IN BANKRUPTCY: 2013
    Charles M. Oellermann and Mark G. Douglas
    The eyes of the financial world were on the U.S. during 2013. The view was dismaying
    and encouraging in roughly equal parts. The U.S. rang in the new year with a postlast-
    minute deal to avoid the Fiscal Cliff that kicked negotiations over “sequestration”—$
    110 billion in across-the-board cuts to military and domestic spending—two
    months down the road, but raised income taxes (on the wealthiest Americans) for
    the first time in two decades.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Jones Day, Debt, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    European perspective in brief - September/October 2013
    2013-09-30

    Europe has struggled mightily during the last several years to triage a long series of critical blows to the economies of the 28 countries that comprise the European Union, as well as the collective viability of eurozone economies. Here we provide a snapshot of some recent developments regarding insolvency, restructuring, and related issues in the EU. 

    Filed under:
    France, Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Money laundering
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    France, Germany
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    From the top in brief
    2013-06-01

    The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first bankruptcy decision of 2013 on May 13. In a unanimous ruling, the court held in Bullock v. BankChampaign N.A., 2013 BL 125909 (U.S. May 13, 2013), that the term “defalcation” for purposes of denying discharge of a debt under section 523(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code includes a “culpable state of mind” requirement involving knowledge of, or gross recklessness with respect to, the improper nature of a fiduciary’s behavior.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Fiduciary, Remand (court procedure)
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Continued recession not “extraordinary circumstance” justifying modification of confirmed chapter 11 plan
    2013-01-31

    Affirming the bankruptcy court below in a case of first impression, in In re Caviata Attached Homes, LLC, 481 B.R. 34 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2012), a Ninth Circuit bankruptcy appellate panel held that a relapse into economic recession following a chapter 11 debtor’s emergence from bankruptcy was not an “extraordinary circumstance” that would justify the filing of a new chapter 11 case for the purpose of modifying the debtor’s previously confirmed plan of reorganization.

    Modification of a Confirmed Chapter 11 Plan

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Financial support directions and insolvency: the pensions regulator's view
    2012-09-20

    Summary

    On 26 July 2012, the Pensions Regulator (the 'Regulator') issued a statement on financial support directions (FSDs) with the intention of providing further guidance and comfort with regard to the circumstances in which it will issue an FSD after a company has been placed into administration.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, The Pensions Regulator, Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Kay V. Morley , John J. Papadakis , David Harding
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Effect of acceleration upon a Chapter 11 filing on enforceability of make-whole or prepayment premiums
    2012-05-14

    Indentures often contain make-whole premiums payable upon early redemption of the debt, and term B loan agreements often include "soft call" protection in the form of prepayment premiums during the early life of the loan. If the debt issuer becomes subject to a chapter 11 proceeding after the debt issuance, the question then arises as to how this payment obligation is to be treated: Does the make-whole or prepayment premium constitute unmatured interest due as a result of the debt acceleration, which would be disallowed, or is it liquidated damages?

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Debtor, Interest, Debt, Maturity (finance), Liquidated damages
    Authors:
    Vanessa G. Spiro
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 104
    • Page 105
    • Page 106
    • Page 107
    • Current page 108
    • Page 109
    • Page 110
    • Page 111
    • Page 112
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days