Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Using tax monies to fund the running expenses of a Company led to restriction of Directors
    2016-06-07

    In Leahy v Doyle & anor [2016] IEHC 177, the High Court issued orders of restriction in respect of directors of two companies (Gingersnap and Scappa), under Section 150 of the Companies Act 1990 (now Section 819 of the Companies Act 2014). While the companies were different, the liquidator and the directors were the same.

    Background 

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, A&L Goodbody, Security (finance), Investment funds, European Commission, European Banking Authority, Central Bank of Ireland, Irish Stock Exchange, High Court (Ireland)
    Authors:
    Paula Mullooly
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    Enforcement delayed - failure to serve letter of demand correctly
    2016-06-21

    This case1 concerned a challenge to a High Court judgment which was entered against Mr Hanley for failure to repay monies borrowed pursuant to a loan agreement. Mr Hanley asserted that he had never received a letter of demand for repayment of the loan monies borrowed. The Court noted that the notice of demand went, in error, to another Mr Hanley that had no connection to the Defendant.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, A&L Goodbody
    Authors:
    Louise McNabola
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    Clerys Report - Key Proposals on Laws Protecting Employees
    2016-06-27

    In early 2016, the Government commissioned an examination into laws protecting employees following the overnight closure of the historic Clerys department store in Dublin in June 2015, with the immediate loss of 460 jobs. We review the recently published report which sets out six key proposals for legislative reform.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mason Hayes & Curran LLP, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Ian O’Herlihy , Elizabeth Ryan
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
    Resolving the Mortgage Arrears Crisis (Vol. 1/2016)
    2016-03-23

    This briefing summarises recent legislation, cases and trends relevant to ongoing efforts to resolve the mortgage arrears crisis.

    Recent Legislation

    Recent legal and regulatory developments relevant to the mortgage arrears crisis have included:

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Arthur Cox LLP, Mortgage loan
    Authors:
    Orla O'Connor , Cormac Kissane , Robert Cain , Deirdre O'Mahony
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    Arthur Cox LLP
    Challenge to the Appointment of a Receiver on the basis of Non Est Factum
    2016-04-12

    Freeman V Bank of Scotland plc, Simon Davidson and Lloyd Daly & Associates Ltd [2016] IESC 14

    This Supreme Court decision is as a result of an appeal from a judgment of McGovern J in the High Court which was delivered on 29th May 2014.

    Background

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, A&L Goodbody
    Authors:
    Louise McNabola
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    Bank Has No Duty of Care to Advise Customers on the Wisdom of Commercial Transactions
    2016-04-12

    In Delaney v AIB [2016] IECA 5, Court of Appeal, Peart J, 28 January 2016 the Court of Appeal held that a bank had no duty of care to advise customers on the wisdom of a commercial transaction. 

    Facts

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, A&L Goodbody, Duty of care
    Authors:
    Paula Mullooly
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    PIPs: Disclosure Obligations akin to an Officer of the Court
    2016-04-21

    In a significant recent judgment, the High Court has set aside an extension of a protective certificate issued to a debtor under the Personal Insolvency Act 2012 on the grounds of material and culpable non-disclosure by a personal insolvency practitioner.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCann FitzGerald LLP, Debtor, Ex parte
    Authors:
    Josh Hogan , Lisa Smyth
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    McCann FitzGerald LLP
    Director who was 'deceived' not restricted by the Court
    2016-04-26

    In Murphy -v- O'Flynn & anor [2016] IEHC 197 a liquidator sought an order from the Court restricting William and Deirdre O’Flynn from acting as directors pursuant to Section 150 of the Companies Act 1990.

    Applicable Law 

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, A&L Goodbody
    Authors:
    Paula Mullooly
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    High Court Orders Restriction of Directors in Two Separate Decisions
    2016-05-10

    The High Court (Binchy J), has recently made restriction orders in respect of directors in two separate applications before it.

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, A&L Goodbody, Board of directors
    Authors:
    Paula Mullooly
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    Duty on Directors to Show They Acted Responsibly
    2016-05-24

    In McAteer & anor v McBrien & ors [2016] IEHC 229, the High Court made an order restricting three directors pursuant to Section 150 of the Companies Act 1990 (now Section 819 of the Companies Act 2014).  The first named respondent (A) was the husband of the second named respondent (B) and father of the third named respondent (C) and all were directors of the Company on the date of the liquidation.

    Background

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, A&L Goodbody, Investment funds, European Commission, Competition and Markets Authority (UK)
    Authors:
    Paula Mullooly
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 39
    • Page 40
    • Page 41
    • Page 42
    • Current page 43
    • Page 44
    • Page 45
    • Page 46
    • Page 47
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days