Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Like-kind exchanges and the use of a qualified intermediary
    2009-05-28

    Under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, a taxpayer does not recognize gain or loss on the exchange of like-kind property. Before 1984, the Code did not specifically address so-called deferred exchanges - exchanges in which the taxpayer relinquished property and some time later received the replacement property - although at least one leading case did. The 1984 rules require that the taxpayer identify the replacement property within 45 days after the disposition and close on the replacement property and close within 180 days after the disposition.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Consideration, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Eastern District of Virginia
    Authors:
    Anthony Ilardi, Jr. , Robert Davidson , Sheryl L. Toby , Wayne D. Roberts
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC
    Unintended tax consequences for investors in debt obligations
    2009-06-09

    With an increasing emphasis on identifying value in the marketplace, entrepreneurs have focused their efforts on acquiring debt instruments, senior secured and mezzanine, in particular. Two primary strategies are being employed with respect to the debt: (1) acquire the debt for the purposes of restructuring the terms with the borrower(s) or (2) acquire the debt for the purpose of exercising the creditor’s remedies (i.e., foreclosing on the equity).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Public company, Debtor, Interest, Option (finance), Debt, Foreclosure, Fair market value, Secured loan, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Ronald Gart
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Credit CARD Act of 2009 favors credit counseling agencies approved for bankruptcy counseling
    2009-06-19

    On May 22, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “Credit CARD Act of 2009” or the “Act”), Public Law No: 111-24. The Act is intended to crackdown on certain credit card practices perceived as abusive – such as retroactive interest rate increases, "double cycle" billing and the offering of "fee harvester" cards. For credit counseling agencies and those that advertise and market debt management plan services to consumers, the Act is notable in three primary ways:

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Non-profit Organizations, Venable LLP, Tax exemption, Credit card, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Education, Federal Reserve Board, 501(c) organisation, US Department of Justice, Government Accountability Office, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Trustee
    Authors:
    Jonathan L. Pompan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Venable LLP
    1031 exchange agreements: drafting failure can lead to unsecured status
    2009-07-08

    A Virginia bankruptcy court has issued a decision that should be a major eye-opener for any entity that engages in tax-free exchanges under section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Breach of contract, Interest, Liability (financial accounting), Beneficial interest, Internal Revenue Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jeanne S. Lofgren
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Tax practitioner privilege, what does Valero tell us?
    2009-08-19

    On June 17, 2009, the Seventh Circuit examined the tax practitioner privilege in Valero Energy Corporation v. U.S., 103 AFTR 2d 2009-2683. Valero, a large oil refiner, expanded its operations in 2001 by acquiring Ultra Diamond Shamrock Corporation (“UDS”). Prior to the acquisition, Ernst & Young developed a restructuring and refinancing plan for UDS’s Canadian subsidiaries. Valero asked its tax advisors, Arthur Anderson, to review the plan and provide additional tax advice.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Audit, Marketing, Attorney-client privilege, Legal burden of proof, Common law, Refinancing, Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Federal Government, US Congress, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Scott Dayan , Donald Reiser
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
    Will the debt relief vertical survive?
    2009-11-12

    On November 4, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC” or “Commission”) held a public forum to discuss proposed amendments to the Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”) to address the sale of debt relief services. The proposed rules would reshape the availability of alternatives to bankruptcy and services to counter the efforts of debt collectors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Venable LLP, Tax exemption, Waiver, Telemarketing, Advertising, Marketing, Government agency, Debt, Debt relief, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Federal Trade Commission Act 1914 (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Jonathan L. Pompan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Venable LLP
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Imputes Officer's Fraudulent Intent to Corporation in Avoidance Litigation
    2024-01-31

    A powerful tool afforded to a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") is the power to recover pre-bankruptcy transfers that are avoidable under federal bankruptcy law (or sometimes state law) because they were either made with the intent to defraud creditors or are constructively fraudulent because the debtor-transferor received less than reasonably equivalent value in exchange and was insolvent at the time, or was rendered insolvent as a consequence of the transfer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Authors:
    S. Chrstopher Cundra IV (Chris)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Imputes Officer's Fraudulent Intent to Corporation in Avoidance Litigation
    2024-01-31

    A powerful tool afforded to a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") is the power to recover pre-bankruptcy transfers that are avoidable under federal bankruptcy law (or sometimes state law) because they were either made with the intent to defraud creditors or are constructively fraudulent because the debtor-transferor received less than reasonably equivalent value in exchange and was insolvent at the time, or was rendered insolvent as a consequence of the transfer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Authors:
    S. Chrstopher Cundra IV (Chris)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Imputes Officer's Fraudulent Intent to Corporation in Avoidance Litigation
    2024-01-31

    A powerful tool afforded to a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") is the power to recover pre-bankruptcy transfers that are avoidable under federal bankruptcy law (or sometimes state law) because they were either made with the intent to defraud creditors or are constructively fraudulent because the debtor-transferor received less than reasonably equivalent value in exchange and was insolvent at the time, or was rendered insolvent as a consequence of the transfer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Authors:
    S. Chrstopher Cundra IV (Chris)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Imputes Officer's Fraudulent Intent to Corporation in Avoidance Litigation
    2024-01-31

    A powerful tool afforded to a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") is the power to recover pre-bankruptcy transfers that are avoidable under federal bankruptcy law (or sometimes state law) because they were either made with the intent to defraud creditors or are constructively fraudulent because the debtor-transferor received less than reasonably equivalent value in exchange and was insolvent at the time, or was rendered insolvent as a consequence of the transfer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Authors:
    S. Chrstopher Cundra IV (Chris)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Current page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days