Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Professional liability policy proceeds not property of bankruptcy estates
    2011-06-23

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada has held that proceeds from a professional liability policy were not property of the insured-debtors' bankruptcy estate because the proceeds were payable only for the benefit of third party claimants and could not be accessed by the debtors directly.  In re Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, Nos. BK-S-09-22780-MKN, S-09-22776-MKN, S-09-22784-MKN, 2011 WL 2184387 (Bankr. D. Nev. May 23, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Nevada, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Professional Negligence, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Proceeds from insurance settlement outside the scope of Article 9
    2015-03-31

    The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit recently held that a creditor holding a perfected security interest in accounts and payment intangibles did not have a perfected security interest in the proceeds of an insurance settlement. In re Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Ry., Ltd., 521 B.R. 703 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2014). In this case, the creditor had extended a line of credit to the borrower, which it secured by a security interest in all the borrower’s accounts and payment intangibles. The creditor filed a financing statement to perfect its security interest.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Spencer Fane LLP, Debtor, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, First Circuit
    Authors:
    Andrea Chase
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Spencer Fane LLP
    Fraudulent schemes in life settlements investments: avoid falling into a scam
    2015-03-20

    Since 2008, many individuals have been looking for investments outside of bonds or the stock market that provide guaranteed payments at higher rates of return.  Some have turned to investing in precious metals, while others have looked to investing in life insurance policies.  Many are familiar with the word “viaticals” that became well known during the 1980’s, when people began purchasing life insurance policies on the lives of people with chronic or terminal illnesses, such as AIDS.  With viaticals, the insured usually had a limited life expectancy and the owner of the viat

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Berger Singerman LLP
    Authors:
    Deborah B. Talenfeld
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Berger Singerman LLP
    Security interests in business interruption insurance under the UCC
    2015-02-17

    A recent decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit, Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company v. Keach,[1] ruled that a lender (Wheeling) did not have a perfected security interest in a business interruption insurance policy or its proceeds.  The decision in Wheeling is inconsistent with a prior court decision that dealt with business interruption insurance as proceeds of collateral and was more favorable to secured creditors, and therefore should be of concern to lenders.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Ice Miller LLP, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, First Circuit
    Authors:
    John Lawlor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Ice Miller LLP
    Iowa insurance Commissioner petitions for liquidation of Iowa/Nebraska CO-OP; how financially sound are others?
    2015-02-04

    The Iowa Commissioner of Insurance (the “Commissioner”) filed a petition, on January 29, 2015, seeking to liquidate CoOpportunity Health, Inc. (“CoOpportunity”), a Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (“CO-OP”) established under the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) that has sold health insurance on the Iowa and Nebraska Exchanges.

    Filed under:
    USA, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Foley & Lardner LLP, Affordable Care Act 2010 (USA)
    Authors:
    C. Frederick Geilfuss II , Kevin G. Fitzgerald , Morgan J. Tilleman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Vermont Supreme Court strikes down Ambassador in Liquidation’s 12/31/13 bar date!
    2015-01-23

    Today, the Vermont Supreme Court issues its opinion in the Ambassador in Liquidation case striking down the estate’s previously-published 12/31/13 bar date for final Proofs of Claim. The Ambassador Ins. Co. liquidation has been in process since 1987.  After the estate obtained over $300,000,000 in reinsurance and settlement proceeds from its former auditing firm, the estate essentially became “solvent”—paying Priority Four claims at 100 percent (plus interest).

    Filed under:
    USA, Vermont, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Barnes & Thornburg LLP
    Authors:
    James J. Leonard
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP
    Tune up your D&O insurance policy to make sure it provides
    2014-12-22

    A D&O liability policy protects key individuals in a corporate structure.  These individuals are likely targets for shareholder frustration if an entity is underperforming or suffering from other troubles.  In addition, they may be exposed to personal scrutiny from regulators if the corporation is investigated for any wrongdoing.  As previously discussed in this space, an insurance policy can provide more reliable protection for t

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Shareholder
    Authors:
    Virginia Whitehill Guldi
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
    Yet another reason why D&O insurance is critical
    2014-12-15

    Corporate directors and officers may think indemnification provisions are sufficient to protect them from claims asserted against them by shareholders or regulators.  However, if a director or officer chooses to rely solely on indemnification in bylaws or contracts, and ignores the availability of directors & officers (“D&O”) liability insurance, he or she could be making a significant mistake.  In particular, a D&O policy can offer these individuals more reliable protection in times of financial distress.  When corporations are plagued by regulatory or other lega

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
    Authors:
    Virginia Whitehill Guldi
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
    Time to file proof of claim with Lumbermens in liquidation
    2014-11-04

    November 10, 2014, is the deadline for filing proof of claims with the Office of the Special Deputy Receiver in Illinois regarding the estates of Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company and American Motorists Insurance Company. Those insurance companies are all part of the Lumbermens Mutual Group and were formerly known as Kemper. They entered liquidation on May 10, 2013.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Reed Smith LLP
    Authors:
    Timothy P. Law , Paul Walker-Bright , Laura M. Geiger , Kevin B. Dreher
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania approves reinsurance commutation agreement
    2014-10-28

    On September 4, 2014, the receivership court for the Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance’) estate (the “Reliance Estate”) approved a settlement agreement allowing the Liquidator to terminate and commute the obligations between Odyssey and Reliance under the reinsurance agreements.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Carlton Fields, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
    Authors:
    Kelly Cruz-Brown
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Carlton Fields

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 63
    • Page 64
    • Page 65
    • Page 66
    • Current page 67
    • Page 68
    • Page 69
    • Page 70
    • Page 71
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days