Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Exploring the scope of s127 Insolvency Act 1986 in relation to the transfer of shares
    2017-04-06

    Key Points

    • A trust can be created and enforceable in respect of assets sited in a jurisdiction that does not recognise the concept of a trust
    • In circumstances where the owner of a beneficial right goes into liquidation, the transfer of legal rights held by a third party to a bonafide purchaser for value is not a disposition within the meaning of s127.

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Taylor Wessing, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Katherine Hudson
    Location:
    Cayman Islands, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    New year blues
    2010-01-05

    THE PERENNIAL PROBLEM OF UNPAID DEBTS – YOUR RECOVERY OPTIONS

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Costs in English law, Debtor, Injunction, Consideration, Solicitor, Debt, Liquidation, Court costs, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Prescribed part and security holders
    2008-07-25

    One of the significant changes to distributions in insolvency made by the Enterprise Act 2002 was the abolition of the preferential status of debts owed to the Crown and the introduction of a provision for the creation of a ‘ring-fenced fund’ (also known as the “prescribed part”, an amount currently capped at £600,000) from the proceeds of floating charges created after 15 September 2003 to be applied in distribution to unsecured creditors.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Share (finance), Unsecured debt, Debt, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Liquidator (law), Unsecured creditor, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Enterprise Act 2002 (UK), High Court of Justice
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 84
    • Page 85
    • Page 86
    • Page 87
    • Current page 88
    • Page 89
    • Page 90
    • Page 91
    • Page 92
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days