Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Exploring the scope of s127 Insolvency Act 1986 in relation to the transfer of shares
    2017-04-06

    Key Points

    • A trust can be created and enforceable in respect of assets sited in a jurisdiction that does not recognise the concept of a trust
    • In circumstances where the owner of a beneficial right goes into liquidation, the transfer of legal rights held by a third party to a bonafide purchaser for value is not a disposition within the meaning of s127.

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Taylor Wessing, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Katherine Hudson
    Location:
    Cayman Islands, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    It is all in the timing: High Court confirms Globespan decision on when an administration appointment truly ends
    2013-07-15

    An administrators’ appointment automatically ends after one year, unless steps are taken to extend it. The Enterprise Act introduced a new streamlined process for moving quickly and easily from administration to creditors’ voluntary liquidation, just by filing a notice at Companies House under para 83(3) Sch B1 of the Insolvency Act (IA)1986. Problems have arisen where that notice has been filed very late in the day and not received before the administrators’ term of office automatically ends.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Liquidation, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Companies House, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Daniel French
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Restructuring & insolvency review
    2011-03-14

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Costs in English law, Abuse of process, Solicitor, Debt, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Honda
    Authors:
    Devinder Singh , John Alderton , Cathryn Williams , Susan Kelly
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Sanders Hammonds
    The Pensions Regulator’s moral hazard powers may enjoy super-priority in insolvency
    2011-01-18

    The much awaited court decision on the status of Financial Support Directions (“FSDs”) and Contribution Notices (“CNs”) * issued by the Pensions Regulator against target companies after the commencement of English insolvency processes in respect of such targets was handed down by the court on Friday 10 December 2010. The reluctant decision of Mr Justice Briggs that FSDs and CNs in these circumstances were not provable debts but ranked as expenses of the insolvency process, taking precedence ahead of unsecured creditors, has caused dismay in the restructuring community.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Disability, Defined benefit pension plan, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Pensions Act 2004 (UK), Pensions Act 1995 (UK), The Pensions Regulator, Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Cathryn Williams , Andrew J. Knight
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 84
    • Page 85
    • Page 86
    • Page 87
    • Current page 88
    • Page 89
    • Page 90
    • Page 91
    • Page 92
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days