The changes to the director disqualification regime brought by the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Act 2021 (the "Act") come into effect on 15 February 2022. We discuss the extension of disqualification proceedings and the impact on directors here.
The Changes
The Economic Survey prepared by the Economic Division, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India is an annual performance report of the Country’s economy which focuses on the economic developments in the country of each and every sector and helps in better utilization of resources and their allocation in the Union Budget. The Economic Survey is presented before the Budget and the theme of Economic Survey 2021-22, relates to the art and science of policymaking under conditions of extreme uncertainty.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) was enacted to revamp the insolvency and bankruptcy laws and resolve problems being faced by creditors due to non-repayment of outstanding dues by corporate borrowers. Since our 2020 snapshot on 15 key developments in insolvency law, the Code has been further refined and amended in line with the object of the Code and taking into account the COVID 19 pandemic. The insolvency courts have also played their part in the development of the Code considering the business realities and practical considerations.
Company directors who act in breach of their statutory and fiduciary duties can face disqualification for up to 15 years pursuant to the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA). Prior to 15 February 2022, civil disqualification proceedings on the grounds of unfitness could only be brought in relation to directors of 'live' companies under s.8 CDDA (where the court retains a discretion whether or not to disqualify) or those subject to insolvency proceedings under s.6 CDDA (where the court is obliged to exercise its power to disqualify).
“[E]nsnared between his involvement in a business that is legal under the laws of Arizona but illegal under federal law,” one debtor’s chapter 13 petition was recently dismissed due to his undisputed violations of the Controlled Substances Act.
After a lawsuit filed by liquidators of a company that collapsed against the company’s former officers, directors, and independent auditors was dismissed in limine, a new Israeli Supreme Court ruling overturned that decision and allowed the liquidators to move forward with the lawsuit, alleging that lack of oversight was what led to the company’s collapse.
１．はじめに
2021年12月15日、インドネシアの憲法裁判所は、破産および債務の支払義務の停止に関する2004年法律第37号（「倒産法」）235条1項及び293条1項において定められた、支払停止手続に対する法的救済がないことについての司法審査に関する決定（No. 23/PUU-XIX/2021（「本件決定」）を致しました。本ニュースレターでは本件決定の内容についてご説明致します。
２．背景
インドネシアでは、破産手続とは別に、日本でいう民事再生手続に相当する支払停止手続（Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang）（「PKPU」）が規定されております。PKPUにおいては、債務者が、返済額の減額や返済スケジュールなどを盛り込んだ再生計画を提出し、裁判所が各債権者の同意を得て再生計画の認可・不認可を決定するとされております。同決定は全債権者を拘束するところ、下記のように、倒産法235条1項及び293条は、当該決定については法的救済が無い旨を規定しております。
This Spring will see the introduction of a number of landmark developments in Jersey’s statutory insolvency regimes, which will further solidify Jersey’s reputation as a leading offshore location for businesses.
Following a consultation process by government, the Jersey legislature has now approved a number of important changes to the corporate insolvency regimes under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 (the “CJL”).
From 15 February 2022, the UK Insolvency Service is granted new powers to investigate and disqualify or prosecute directors of dissolved UK companies. The Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Act (the Act) extends the Insolvency Service’s powers, on behalf of the UK Business Secretary, to deal with company directors who abuse the company dissolution process.