Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    What happens to direct life insurances in the event of an employer’s insolvency in Germany?
    2010-09-30

    The Federal Labour Court has ruled on the fundamental issue of who will be entitled to the rights under a life insurance policy concluded by the employer in the employee’s favour in the event that an employment relationship comes to an end in the course of the employer’s insolvency proceeding.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Statutory interpretation, Beneficiary, Life insurance, Vesting, US Senate, SCOTUS
    Authors:
    Ian Gault , Daniel Schaffer , Alison Brown , Roderick Morton
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Recent legal developments in the Middle East
    2010-02-10

    Dubai World – government releases details of a tailor-made restructuring process

    In the wake of the high profile financial problems affecting the Dubai World group, the Dubai government has announced a new reorganisation law in case that group is unable to achieve an acceptable restructuring of its debts. New legislation was needed because the status of Dubai World as a company incorporated under special legislation means that the UAE insolvency laws do not apply to it. The new legislation:

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Public company, Employment contract, Joint venture, Dispute resolution, Dubai International Financial Centre
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Court of Appeal determines effect of party's insolvency in one EU jurisdiction on arbitral proceedings in another
    2009-10-05

    Background

    Article 4.1 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on Insolvency Proceedings (the "Regulation") states: "Save as otherwise provided in this Regulation, the law applicable to insolvency proceedings and their effects shall be that of the Member State within the territory of which such proceedings are opened..."

    Article 4.2 of the Regulation sets out a non-exhaustive list of the matters which the law of the state of the opening of insolvency proceedings is to determine, including:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Arbitration clause, In rem jurisdiction, Arbitration Act 1996 (UK), London Court of International Arbitration
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Exception to Jackson reforms for claims by insolvent companies
    2013-01-25

    The government has clarified which claims will benefit from the continued recoverability of CFA success fees and ATE insurance premiums, following its announcement in May last year that there would be a two-year delay to implementation of this aspect of the Jackson reforms for “insolvency proceedings” (see post).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Sonya Leydecker , Anna Pertoldi , Maura McIntosh
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    PE houses and pre-packs - will the Pensions Regulator act?
    2011-10-05

    The story of the restructuring of carpet-maker, Brintons has featured in the press recently, with emphasis on the role of Carlyle, one of the world's biggest private equity firms. The facts are similar to the Silentnight pre-pack which we featured in a previous bulletin. In each case, the Pensions Regulator is said to be considering using its anti-avoidance powers under the Pensions Act 2004 to compel senior debt holders to pay towards the deficit of the defined benefit pension scheme operated by the company.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Corporate Finance/M&A, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Unsecured debt, Private equity, Debt, Investment funds, Defined benefit pension plan, Unsecured creditor, Pension Protection Fund, Pensions Act 2004 (UK), The Pensions Regulator, Trustee
    Authors:
    Ian Gault , Daniel Schaffer , Alison Brown , Roderick Morton , Naveed Soomro
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Panel clarifies the line of acceptability in exclusivity arrangements
    2010-09-29

    In brief

    Filed under:
    Australia, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Confidentiality, Shareholder, Fiduciary, Interest, Deed, Due diligence
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Section 75 debts: exception for internal group restructurings
    2010-02-05

    It is likely that changes to the employer debt regulations (the so-called "section 75 debt" regime) will come into force on 6 April. These will prevent a debt from arising on certain internal group restructurings where there is no weakening of the employer covenant. However, the regulations are highly prescriptive and are, therefore, less attractive as a means of dealing with section 75 debts when compared to apportionment or withdrawal arrangements.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Debt
    Authors:
    Ian Gault , Roderick Morton , Alison Brown
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    IP licences and insolvency - deprivation principle held to apply to provisions relating to the termination of an IP licence on insolvency
    2009-09-18

    In Butters and ors v BBC Worldwide Ltd and ors, decided on 20 August 2009, the Court held that contractual provisions in a joint venture agreement taken together with termination provisions in a licence of IP rights were void since the effect of those provisions on insolvency was to deprive creditors access to assets and therefore contrary to public policy in the light of insolvency laws.

    BUSINESS IMPACT

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Joint venture, Public limited company, Prejudice, Subsidiary
    Authors:
    Joel Smith , Laura Deacon
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Court of Appeal interprets settlement agreement as releasing party’s own affiliates, including former administrators and their solicitors
    2022-08-08

    The Court of Appeal has held that a settlement agreement between a bank and a group of companies which included releases of the parties’ affiliates prevented the companies from later pursuing claims against their own affiliates. Those affiliates were held to include former administrators appointed by the bank and the administrators’ solicitors: Schofield v Smith [2022] EWCA Civ 824.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Libor, Mediation, UK Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Anna Pertoldi , Maura McIntosh , Jan O'Neill
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    What’s on the menu? Insurers must ask the right questions at placement
    2021-11-09

    In Ristorante Limited T/A Bar Massimo v Zurich Insurance Plc [2021] EWHC 2538 (Ch), the Court considered the interpretation and legal effect of a question asked by an insurer to a prospective insured around prior insolvency issues. The insured agreed with the insurer’s question, as framed, that there were no prior insolvency issues. Insurers failed in their attempt to avoid the policy for breach of the duty of fair presentation based on alleged misrepresentation. Insolvency events in relation to other companies did not need to be disclosed.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 5005
    • Page 5006
    • Page 5007
    • Page 5008
    • Current page 5009
    • Page 5010
    • Page 5011
    • Page 5012
    • Page 5013
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days