Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Commercial wisdom of the liquidator upheld by the Supreme Court
    2022-09-14

    Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code), if a corporate debtor is unable to pay its debts, then insolvency resolution proceedings (CIRP) may be initiated against the corporate debtor and attempts are made to revive the corporate debtor by inviting resolution plans. If the revival process fails, the corporate debtor must be liquidated.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Acuity Law, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Souvik Ganguly , Altamash Qureshi , Shrishti Mishra
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Acuity Law
    NCLAT: IPR Constitutes Operational Debt Under IBC
    2022-09-16

    In a recent order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (“NCLAT”) in Somesh Choudhary v Knight Riders Sports Private Limited & Anr. under Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Khaitan & Co, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Rahul Chakraborti , Nikhila Dewasthale , Saumya Agarwal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Khaitan & Co
    ERGO Analysing Development Impacting Business: Limited Judicial Review by NCLT and NCLAT During Liquidation Proceedings: Supreme Court
    2022-09-12

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Khaitan & Co, Insolvency, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Prateek Kumar , Rohit Ghosh
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Khaitan & Co
    How Will Insufficency in Stamping Impact Insolvency Proceedings? NCLAT Clarifies the Position
    2022-09-14

    A. INTRODUCTION 

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Khaitan & Co, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Prashanth Ramdas , Ananda Chakraverty , Subham Agarwal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Khaitan & Co
    District Magistrate is not empowered to hear the borrower or third parties while deciding a Section 14 application filed by a secured creditor.
    2022-09-12

    On August 3, 2022, a division bench of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“High Court”) comprising of Justice K.R. Shriram, and Justice A.S. Doctor in the case of Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, Secured creditor, Bombay High Court, Supreme Court of India
    Authors:
    Varghese Thomas , Yohaann Limathwalla , Ahsan Allana
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA
    Supreme Court on Interpretation of terms "Operational Creditors" and "Corporate Debtors"- IBC
    2022-09-08

    Since the enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code in 2016 (“IBC, 2016), the judiciary has been very active in settling disputes and addressing the gaps arising from this controversial legislation. Recently, yet another dispute arising out of a technical gap in the IBC has been resolved by the Apex Court in the case of M/s Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. M/s Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited.1 

    Brief facts of the case

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, SS Rana & Co, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Nihit Nagpal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    SS Rana & Co
    Overview of India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
    2022-09-09

    Mani Gupta, Aman Choudhary and Saumya Upadhyay, Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors

    This is an extract from the 2023 edition of GRR's The Asia-Pacific Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

    In summary

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Global Restructuring Review, Coronavirus, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Global Restructuring Review
    Ergo Analysing Developments Impacting Business: Moratorium Prohibits Recovery Proceedings of Customs Duty Against Corporate Debtor: Supreme Court
    2022-09-06

    INTRODUCTION

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Khaitan & Co, Bankruptcy, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India
    Authors:
    Prateek Kumar , Rohit Ghosh
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Khaitan & Co
    Pendency of insolvency petition does not bar appointment of arbitrator- India
    2022-09-07

    The Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide its order dated May 13, 2022, in Millennium Education Foundation Vs Educomp Infrastructure And School Management Limited, has held that the mere pendency of an insolvency petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is not a bar for appointment of Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

    Filed under:
    India, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, SS Rana & Co, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (India), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Delhi High Court
    Authors:
    Nihit Nagpal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    SS Rana & Co
    Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of Real Estate Company- India
    2022-09-08

    The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench vide its order dated April 25, 2022 in Mr. N. Kumar v. Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd.1 held that the project-wise Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of a real estate company is outside the purview of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).

    Brief facts of the case

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, SS Rana & Co, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    SS Rana & Co

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Current page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days