There has always been a matter of contention for a Committee of Creditors, Resolution Professionals, legal fraternity during Corporate Resolution Insolvency Process (CIRP), whether the dues of the Government like Income-Tax, Sales Tax, Value Added Tax etc. are secured debt and whether the Government is a secured creditor.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has answered this question in affirmative in its recent๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐๐ต ๐๐ฒ๐ฏ., ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฏ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น (๐๐ง) (๐๐ป๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐) ๐ก๐ผ. ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฎ (๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ & ๐๐ป๐ฟ. ๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ฑ).
On July 12, 2022, the Supreme Court of India (โSupreme Courtโ) passed a judgment in Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited[1] (โVidarbhaโ), which considered the question whether Section 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (โCodeโ), is mandatory or discretionary in nature.
This is the second in a two-part series article providing suggestions with respect to the recent discussion paper published by the MCA on 18 January 2023, proposing several major amendments to the IBC Code, 2016.
MCAโs recent discussion paper has proposed significant amendments to address several nagging issues in the working of the IBC. In the first part of this series, we highlighted some proposals that required a closer look. This piece discusses positive suggestions that could substantially improve the insolvency regime and enhance its efficiency.
Over the last few years, several cases of defaulting real estate companies, including major players like, Amrapali, Jaypee Infratech and Supertech, have been stuck at various stages of insolvency proceedings under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended (โCodeโ).
February, 2023
A BRIEFING ON LEGAL MATTERS OF CURRENT INTEREST
KEY HIGHLIGHTS Allahabad High Court: No ipso facto absolvement of guarantor's liability upon approval of resolution plan. NCLAT: The obligation of the adjudicating authority to direct for liquidation shall rise only when decision of the Committee of Creditors is in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Rise of ESG Investing in India: What it Means for Corporations.
For Private Circulation - Educational & Informational Purpose Only
February, 2023
In the case of State Bank of India v. Moser Baer Karamachari Union & Ors., the Supreme Court of India (โSupreme Courtโ) has upheld the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (โNCLATโ) in the matter of State Bank of India v. Moser Baer Karamachari Union & Anr. (โMoser Baer Caseโ).
The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (โDelhi HCโ) in the case of Tata Steel BSL Limited v. Venus Recruiters Private Limited & Ors., etc. has put to rest the issue on avoidance applications proceedings surviving the conclusion of corporate insolvency resolution process (โCIRPโ) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (โIBCโ).
The Supreme Court of India (โSupreme Courtโ) in the case of Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. has held that the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (โSARFAESI Actโ) for recovery of dues payable to a secured creditor will prevail over the provisions of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (โMSMED Actโ).
Brief Facts
In the case of IL&FS Infrastructure Debt Fund v. McLeod Russel India Limited, the Kolkata bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (โNCLTโ) held that in order to determine whether a shortfall undertaking will qualify as an instrument of guarantee as defined under Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (โContract Actโ), one has to look into the intention of the parties as reflected in the terms of such undertaking.
In the recent decision of IDBI Bank v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (โNCLATโ) has held that an irrevocable and unconditional bank guarantee can be invoked even during moratorium period in view of the amended provision under Section 14 (3) (b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (โIBCโ).
Brief Facts