Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Tenth Circuit holds that U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Law v. Siegel and Travelers Casualty v. Pacific Gas & Electric do no change established Tenth Circuit law on recharacterization of debt to equity
    2015-10-13

    Recently, the Tenth Circuit considered a case involving the question of whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 549 U.S. 443 (2007) and in Law v. Siegel, 134 S. Ct. 1188 (2014) affected established Tenth Circuit precedent that a bankruptcy court’s authority to recharacterize debt as equity arises under 11 U.S.C. § 105(a).  In its decision inRedmond v. Jenkins, et al (In re Alternate Fuels, Inc.), 789 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Holland & Hart LLP, Tenth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    File a proof of claim, lose your lien? Ninth Circuit holds that lien associated with disallowed claim is void
    2015-10-06

    A recent decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (found here) changes the strategic calculus for a secured creditor deciding whether to file a proof of claim in a bankruptcy case in the Ninth Circuit.  It has long been true that a secured creditor does not necessarily imperil his lien if he ignores a bankruptcy proceeding and declines to file a claim in connection with his lien.  See U.S. Nat’l Bank in Johnstown v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Holland & Hart LLP, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    Another marijuana bankruptcy case bites the dust as the Arizona bankruptcy court dismisses an involuntary case filed against a medical marijuana dispensary
    2015-09-29

    Following its sister court in Colorado[1] the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona recently held that the debtor’s operation of a business that it illegal under federal law mandates dismissal of an involuntary bankruptcy petition filed against the debtor.  In re Medpoint Management, LLC, 528 B.R.

    Filed under:
    USA, Arizona, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Holland & Hart LLP, Medical cannabis, Cannabis, Controlled Substances Act 1971 (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    Supreme Court, citing Dewsnup v. Timm, refuses to allow a debtor to strip off a fully undersecured second lien against debtor’s home
    2015-08-18

    In its opinion in Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Holland & Hart LLP, Debtor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    In a case of first impression at the Circuit Level, Ninth Circuit holds an insider who waives his right to indemnification from the debtor is not a “creditor” for purposes of preferential transfers under SEC. 547 of the Bankruptcy Code
    2015-08-04

    In a case of first impression at the Circuit Level, the Ninth Circuit has held that an insider who waives his right to indemnification from a debtor is not a “creditor” for purposes of preferential transfe

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Holland & Hart LLP, Debtor, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    Ninth Circuit holds public policy prevents attorney from defending client’s fraud claim under the unclean hands doctrine
    2015-07-21

    Client, with the assistance of its attorney, engages in illegal conduct.  Client places money received from its illegal conduct in the attorney’s trust account.  Attorney absconds with these illegal funds.  When the client brings a non-dischargeability action in the attorney’s bankruptcy case, may the attorney defend the action under the unclean hands doctrine because the funds he stole were gained by the client through its own ille

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Legal Practice, Litigation, Holland & Hart LLP, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    Ninth Circuit holds that confirmed and substantially consummated bankruptcy plan is appealable to district court
    2015-07-06

    The Equitable Mootness Doctrine

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Holland & Hart LLP, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    Exercising rights to setoff and recoupment in bankruptcy
    2015-06-04

    Current market conditions are straining business relationships in the oil and gas industry. In a growing number of cases, distressed companies are seeking chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In that event, a creditor-debtor relationship is formed between the bankrupt company and the performing partner. For example, in the context of a joint operating agreement, an operator (the performing partner) may seek to recapture drilling costs from a non-operator (the bankrupt company).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Holland & Hart LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor
    Authors:
    Matthew J. Ochs
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP
    Fraudulent transfer risks in oil and gas transactions
    2015-06-04

    Over the past few months, the economics of the oil and gas industry have changed dramatically. As oil and gas prices have fallen, so too have profit margins and working capital. Many companies will weather this storm. A fortunate few will expand their positions and acquire additional assets, some of which will be purchased from distressed companies. In dealing with these distressed companies and their assets, landmen and other oil and gas industry professionals will need to have a working-knowledge of select bankruptcy-related laws and concepts to protect their company’s assets.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Holland & Hart LLP
    Authors:
    Elizabeth Y. Spencer (Gallaway)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Hart LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Current page 6
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days