In a key test case on the relevance of tax losses (and more broadly, HMRC) under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006, Mr Justice Michael Green in the High Court has sanctioned the second restructuring plan (RP2) of Waldorf Production UK Plc (the Plan Company), overriding HMRC’s challenge by using the cross-class cram down power in s.901G. The judgment resolves, at least at first instance, a series of live questions about the limits of HMRC’s ability to challenge restructuring plans and the proper scope of the “no worse off” test.
Summary
Summary
It has been a while since we have had any cases challenging the fairness of a CVA, but in this recent Scottish decision where HMRC challenged the approval of Petrofac’s CVA on the basis of fairness, the court was required to consider HMRC’s contention that the CVA unfairly prejudiced its interests.
The Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment in DG Resources Ltd v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, a decision that clarifies how winding‑up petitions must be served, an issue with implications for the 30,000 UK businesses using the Companies House default address for receiving official mail.
Background
DG Resources Ltd owed HMRC £1.104 million.
On 11 December 2024 HMRC presented DG Resources with a winding-up petition.
The petition came before Chief ICC Judge Briggs, who made several key findings:
<br>
The High Court has handed down its judgment in a preliminary issues trial in Yodel Delivery Network Ltd v Corlett & Ors on 19 December 2025, dismissing counterclaims by Shift Global Holdings Ltd (Shift) and Corja Holdings Ltd (Corja) for specific performance of purported share warrant rights, which they had said entitled them to more than 54% of Yodel’s issued share capital in the battle for control of the home delivery company.
For what comes next tlt.com Disputes Outlook 2026 Insolvency TLT TLT Disputes Outlook 2026 Disputes Outlook 2026 Contents 2 Contents Live issues Expanded claims against directors of insolvent companies 3 Creditor challenges outside of formal insolvency 3 Increased regulation in the private rented sector 4 Emerging trends Insolvency proceedings as a method of debt recovery 5 Contested winding up and bankruptcy petitions 5 Mid-market restructuring plans 6 Spot the risks. Plan ahead. Resolve with confidence. Disputes aren’t always avoidable, but being prepared can make all the difference.
Introduction
In a recent decision, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) provided useful clarification on how TUPE operates in insolvency scenarios when a provisional liquidator is appointed. The judgment confirms that the TUPE exception for terminal insolvency proceedings can apply earlier than some employers and buyers may expect, with the result that employee transfer protections may be disapplied before a winding-up order is made.
TUPE and insolvency