Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    TUPE 1 Rescue Culture 0: you can't avoid TUPE with a pre pack
    2011-03-07

    The EAT's judgment

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gowling WLG, Contractual term, Bankruptcy, Debt, Liquidation, Prejudice, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Transfers of Undertakings Directive (2001/23/EC), Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    An opportunity for insolvency practitioners: no TUPE in pre-pack administrations?
    2009-02-10

    Pre-2006, it was always clear that TUPE applied to transfer employees working in a business when it was bought out of administration. However, changes in 2006 provided that the automatic transfer principle would not apply to any transfer of a business or undertaking where the transferor was the subject of bankruptcy proceedings, which had been 'instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor'.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gowling WLG, Contractual term, Employment tribunal, Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Authors:
    Jonathan Chamberlain
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    TUPE: pre-transfer dismissals
    2012-01-16

    The Court of Appeal has resolved conflicting decisions at EAT level and confirmed that dismissals which are connected with a subsequent TUPE transfer can be automatically unfair under TUPE even where no specific transfer or purchaser is contemplated at the time of dismissal.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Current page 4
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days