Welcome to this issue of Herbert Smith Freehills' Australian Construction Dispute Resolution Newsletter.
This newsletter updates you on legal developments relevant to your industry by featuring Australian court decisions and legislative developments of particular interest.
In this issue, we look at:
In Hussain v CSR Building Products Limited; In the matter of FPJ Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation) the Federal Court held that a retention of title (ROT) clause secures the purchase price of the goods it covers, and that payment of that price will not be an unfair preference since the creditor has not received payment of an “unsecured debt” within the meaning of section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
The European Court of Justice has held that a director of an English company can be liable for breach of German company law where insolvency proceedings are opened in Germany.
Dispute Resolution Singapore Client Alert July 2015 Singapore High Court determines proprietary interests of customers of insolvent brokerage firm, MF Global Singapore Pte Ltd In the latest instalment arising out of the insolvency of MF Global, the Singapore High Court had to decide whether certain customers of the insolvent brokerage firm had any proprietary interests in the assets of the firm, and whether these assets were held on trust for these customers.
BUSINESS RESCUE, RESTRUCTURING AND INSOLVENCY: THE COURT’S POWER TO SET ASIDE THE DISSENTING VOTE OF A CREDITOR IN BUSINESS RESCUE PROCEEDINGS If satisfied that it is reasonable and just to do so, a court may set aside a dissenting vote on a business rescue plan. In Collard v Jatara Connect (Pty) Ltd & Others [2017] ZAWCHC 45, the court did exactly that. Explaining his decision, Judge Dlodlo stated that there should be no reason to prefer a winding up application over a business rescue plan that will pay the employees of the company in full and result in a better return for creditors.
We know this publication is about dispute resolution, but what we really want to talk about in this article is avoiding insolvency and bankruptcy disputes.
“If Only You Had Come to Us Sooner”
The Law has been issued on the 19th of February and came into force on the 22nd of March which revokes the bankruptcy rules set out in Chapter 5 under the Commercial Code No.17 of the year 1999 (the “Commercial Code”).the newly introduced provisions have been adopted from the US Bankruptcy Law, Chapter 11.
An examination of the impact of an insolvent respondent in an arbitration.
In 2008, the catastrophic effect of the credit crunch spread to most world economies, touching governments, companies and individuals alike. As in previous recessions, insolvency is affecting increasing numbers of individuals and companies. UK government figures show that individual insolvencies went up by 8.8% in the third quarter of 2008, with corporate liquidations up by 10.5% in the same period. Commentators predict that this trend will only accelerate through 2009.
Carey Olsen's Dispute Resolution Group has successfully secured orders on two separate applications under Guernsey's Protection of Investors and Company Law legislation to place two regulated entities into administration and one company into compulsory liquidation.
The Managing Partner of the firm’s Guernsey office, Advocate John Greenfield, and Senior Associate, Tim Bamford, acted for the Guernsey Financial Services Commission (the "Commission") on both applications.
The exercise of the court’s discretionary jurisdiction to wind up an unregistered overseas company has again come under judicial spotlight in the recent case of Re China Medical Technologies Inc. (HCCW 435/2012).