Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Lehman requests bar date for creditor claims
    2009-06-05

    On May 26, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI) filed a motion requesting the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to establish August 24 as the deadline for filing proofs of claim against LBHI and its affiliates, and to establish a procedure for such filing, including a required form to be completed online relating to derivatives claims, and a new proof of claim form specific to this case.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Surety, Debtor, Legal burden of proof, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Fourth Circuit examines swap agreements subject to Bankruptcy Code safe harbors
    2009-06-24

    In Hutson v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fraud, Natural gas, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Commodity, Maturity (finance), Systemic risk, DuPont, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark C. Ellenberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    CFTC proposes to amend bankruptcy rules to establish cleared OTC derivatives as a separate account class
    2009-08-14

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has proposed to amend its Bankruptcy Rules, 17 CFR Part 190, to establish cleared over-the-counter derivatives as a separate account class for the purpose of calculating “net equity” and “allowed net equity” for each customer in the event of the bankruptcy of a futures commission merchant.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Clearing (finance), Futures contract, Commodity broker, Over-the-counter (finance), Margin (finance), US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Code of Federal Regulations
    Authors:
    Christina J. Grigorian
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Litigation challenges counterparty right to withhold payments under Section 2(a)(iii) of ISDA Master Agreement as violation of automatic stay provisions of US Bankruptcy Code
    2009-08-11

    In a recently filed motion in the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York (the “Motion”), Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”) is seeking to compel Metavante Corporation (“Metavante”) to perform its obligations under a swap agreement between Metavante and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Libor, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Derivative exposure and counterparty insolvency: lessons learned in the current market
    2009-09-11

    Almost all large (and many small) companies in today’s economy use derivatives in one way or another to hedge against future risk.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Haynes and Boone LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP
    Lehman bankruptcy court holds ISDA swap counterparty in violation of automatic stay/counterparty seeks modification
    2009-09-29

    In a recent ruling from the bench, Judge James M. Peck of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that Metavante Corporation’s suspension of payments under an outstanding swap agreement with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Default (finance), Systemic risk, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mark C. Ellenberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Lehman bankruptcy court rules on right to withhold payment under ISDA Master Agreement
    2009-09-29

    On September 17, 2009, the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), American International Group, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
    Bankruptcy court orders swap counterparty to pay Lehman Brothers despite event of default
    2009-09-25

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order on Sept. 17, 2009, granting a motion filed by Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (“LBSF”) to compel Metavante Corporation (“Metavante”) to continue to make payments to LBSF under an ISDA Master Agreement.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Swap (finance), Motion to compel, Liquidation, Default (finance), US Congress, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Craig Stein , Kristin Boggiano
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    US Bankruptcy Court finds that payment conditionality is unenforceabe under Section 2 (a) (iii) of the ISDA Master Agreement
    2009-09-24

    The judge responsible for the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings in the United States has found that the provisions of the US bankruptcy code that exempt swap agreements and master netting agreements from the application of the Code's automatic stay and other relevant provisions do not permit a party to an ISDA Master Agreement to suspend performance under Section 2 (a) (iii) of the master agreement.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Bankruptcy, Swap (finance), Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Recent bankruptcy court decisions affecting counterparties to open or terminated derivative contracts with Lehman Brothers entities
    2009-09-23

    On September 17, 2009 Judge Peck of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued two orders that may significantly impact parties who held, or still currently hold, derivative contracts with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (LBSF) or any of the other debtors in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases (the Debtors).

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Swap (finance), Motion to compel, Mediation, Good faith, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers cases, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Current page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days