Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Bankruptcy court declines to accord comity to reorganization plan approved by Mexican court
    2012-11-30

    In re Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V., No. 11-33335-HDH-15 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. June 13, 2012)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Comity, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    David Zaslowsky , Grant Hanessian
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Sale "free and clear" does not extinguish sublessee's right to remain in possession
    2012-12-01

    The ability of a trustee or chapter 11 debtor in possession (“DIP”) to sell bankruptcy estate assets “free and clear” of competing interests in the property has long been recognized as one of the most important advantages of a bankruptcy filing as a vehicle for restructuring a debtor’s balance sheet and generating value. Still, section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, which delineates the circumstances under which an asset can be sold free and clear of “any interest in such property,” has generated a fair amount of controversy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Interest, Debtor in possession, In rem jurisdiction
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Valuing collateral: do low-income housing tax credits count?
    2012-11-27

    In re Creekside Senior Apartments, LP, 477 B.R. 40 (6th Cir. B.A.P. 2012) –

    In valuing a bank claim secured by a low-income housing project for purposes of a plan of reorganization, should the remaining federal low‑income housing tax credits allocated to the project be taken into consideration?  In Creekside the bankruptcy court said yes, and the bankruptcy appellate panel agreed.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Tax, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Tax credit, Limited partnership
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Tax regulation alert – new tax rules to benefit debtors
    2012-11-28

    Pension issues in the American Airlines (AMR) bankruptcy1 have resulted in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issuing new final regulations, effective November 8, 2012 (Final Regulations), which broadly impact all debtors facing underfunded pension plan obligations. The Final Regulations provide chapter 11 bankruptcy debtors facing distress terminations of their tax-qualified defined benefit pension plans with the additional option of amending the plans to eliminate accelerated payment options.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Defined benefit pension plan, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Stephen D. Lerner , Thomas J. Salerno , K. Derek Judd , Bradley A. Cosman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Resolving municipal distress: Chapter 9 and public-private partnerships
    2012-11-28

    The effects of the recent fi nancial crisis and the ensuing recession continue to take their toll on municipalities in the United States, which are struggling with reduced revenues at the same time their residents have an increased need for government services.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Credit rating, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Deryck A. Palmer , Samuel S. Cavior
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
    Supreme Court to address circuit split over 'defalcation' meaning
    2012-11-16

    In a corporate system based in part on the separation of ownership and control, the relationship between principals and agents is riddled with agency problems: Among them are potential conflicts of interest where agents may abuse their fiduciary position for their own benefit as opposed to the benefit of the principals to whom they are obligated. Delineating the agents' fiduciary duties is thus a central focus of corporate law, and the dereliction of those duties often comes under scrutiny in the bankruptcy context.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Duane Morris LLP, Conflict of interest, Debtor, Fiduciary, Debt, Bankruptcy discharge, Eleventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Duane Morris LLP
    Fifth Circuit expected to issue landmark ruling concerning recognition of foreign bankruptcy proceedings contrary to US public policy
    2012-11-20

    In a widely followed dispute, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will soon render a decision on the appeal of a Texas Bankruptcy Court’s refusal to recognize non-debtor third party releases in the Mexican reorganization proceeding (concurso mercantil) of Mexican glass manufacturer Vitro SAB de CV. Wall Street and the capital markets will be watching this appeal closely as a reversal of the Bankruptcy Court would likely make lenders and bondholders extremely nervous about extending future credit to Mexican corporations.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Alan M. Feld
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    Default interest greater than 5% questioned in bankruptcy
    2012-11-20

    The US Bankruptcy Court in Massachusetts says default rates must be justified as a reasonable measure of damages at the time of the making of the loan and that a floating default rate that can exceed 5% will not be allowed as part of a creditors claim in the borrower's bankruptcy.    The loan was made in 2006 with a contract rate equal to prime at a time when the prime rate was below 13 percent.

    Filed under:
    USA, Massachusetts, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Default (finance)
    Authors:
    Michael J. Viscount, Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    IRS issues final regulations permitting plan sponsors to eliminate prohibited payment options
    2012-11-20

    Under Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) section 436, unless a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by a debtor in bankruptcy is fully funded, the plan may not make “prohibited payments” (i.e., lump sum payments or payments in any other form that exceed the monthly amount under a single life annuity). Moreover, the anti-cutback rule in Code section 411(d)(6) prohibits a plan from being amended to eliminate an optional form of benefit.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Haynes and Boone LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Defined benefit pension plan, Actuary, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP
    The need for careful diligence in drafting license agreements reinforced by Eighth Circuit affirmation that a perpetual, royalty-free trademark license is an “executory contract”
    2012-11-12

    One of the most powerful tools a chapter 11 debtor has is the ability to assume or reject executory contracts under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.  In bankruptcy parlance, when a debtor “rejects” an executory contract, it is considered as though the debtor breached the agreement as of the date it filed for bankruptcy and sheds the debtor’s obligation to perform under the rejected contract.  The non-debtor party receives a claim for damages arising from the debtor’s breach; however, in many cases, it will be worth only pennies on the dollar.  The converse of rejection is

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, BakerHostetler, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Eighth Circuit
    Authors:
    Marc Skapof
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    BakerHostetler

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 261
    • Page 262
    • Page 263
    • Page 264
    • Current page 265
    • Page 266
    • Page 267
    • Page 268
    • Page 269
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days