Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Schemes of arrangement: splitting debts to sanction?
    2017-02-22

    In the first case of its kind, the High Court in England has prevented a shareholder from splitting its shareholding in an attempt to defeat the approval of a scheme of arrangement under section 895 of the Companies Act 2006 (Scheme) by way of manipulation of legislative requirements in relation to Schemes which require approval by a majority in number representing 75% in value of the voting class of shareholders.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, DLA Piper, Shareholder, Companies Act 2006 (UK)
    Authors:
    David Ampaw
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    First English Scheme of Arrangement Recognised in Canada under the CCAA
    2019-11-01

    In a recent decision, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice recognised the English law schemes of arrangement of the Syncreon group under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, RSC 1985, c C-36 (“CCAA“). This was the first time a Canadian court was asked to determine whether proceedings under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Companies Act“) could be recognised as “foreign proceedings” under Part IV of the CCAA.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Companies Act 2006 (UK), Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Insolvency enquiries – master of the High Court
    2015-03-31

    Judge Megarry in Re Rolls Razor Limited1, aptly describes the necessity of insolvency enquiries:

    Filed under:
    South Africa, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Companies Act 2006 (UK)
    Authors:
    Keith Braatvedt
    Location:
    South Africa
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Directors' duty to consider the interest of creditors and transactions at an undervalue
    2019-05-08

    The Court of Appeal has given guidance on when the duty of directors to have regard to the interest of creditors arises. This is an important point, as the general statutory duty of a director to promote the success of the company for the benefit of the company's members is expressly subject to the rules on creditors' interests. The court's decision also considers whether a dividend payment can be challenged as a transaction at an undervalue under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Companies Act 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    David Collins , Richard Barham , Anna Janik
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Directors' dealings and company assets
    2017-04-13

    A recent challenge in the High Court by liquidators to recover assets from a director of an insolvent company has highlighted various points of company law. In particular, the court had to consider directors' authority, share buybacks, and transactions between a company and its directors.

    The claimant (D) was the managing director and controlling shareholder of the defendant company (the Company). The Company at first had one other director, D's wife, and later a second (W).

    The liquidator challenged three transactions:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Liquidator (law), Directors' duties, Companies Act 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    David Collins , Richard Barham , Candice Chapman
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Insolvency tourism: will the proposed restructuring moratorium entice more to these shores?
    2010-11-18

    On 26 July 2010, the Insolvency Service issued proposals for a new type of short-term restructuring moratorium. The moratorium would be available through a court-based process to companies with a viable business and the general support of creditors. The proposed moratorium could have the potential to encourage more companies to view the UK as an attractive jurisdiction for restructuring.

    What are the proposals?

    The main features are:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Debt, Extraterritoriality, Liquidation, Balance sheet, Moratorium (law), Stakeholder (corporate), Comity, Debtor in possession, Companies Act 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), UNCITRAL
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Stopping collateral damage
    2008-11-04

    The Banking Bill recasts key aspects of bank supervision and insolvency. With such wide-ranging changes to digest, financial institutions and other companies could be forgiven for ignoring the seemingly obscure clauses relating to financial collateral. But these provisions could remove legal uncertainty for those taking collateral particularly in traded markets (like energy trading) where banks are not always the main players.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Credit risk, Judicial review, Companies Act 2006 (UK), Companies Act 1985 (UK), European Commission
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Distributions to members allowed during Lehman Brothers administration
    2017-09-26

    In a second application heard on the same day, Hildyard J considered an application by the administrators of Lehman Brothers Europe Limited (LBEL) for directions that would enable a surplus to be distributed to the sole member of LBEL while LBEL remained in administration. The proposed scheme had material benefits for both shareholders and creditors. The administrators acknowledged that the orders sought were an indirect means of circumventing the Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), which does not expressly provide for directors to make distributions during an administration.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay, Companies Act 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Bridie McKinnon , Oliver Gascoigne , Matthew Triggs , Myles O'Brien , Susan Rowe , Peter Niven , David Perry , Scott Abel , Kelly Paterson , Scott Barker , Willie Palmer , Jan Etwell , David Broadmore
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    English Court of Appeal provides clarification regarding the regulation of dividend payments to shareholders
    2019-01-29

    Introduction

    In the recent case of Global Corporate Ltd v Hale , the Court of Appeal was asked to assess whether sums, described as “interim dividends”, paid to Mr. Hale (the “Respondent”) in his capacity as both a director and shareholder of Powerstation UK Limited (the “Company”), had been made in accordance with section 830 of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”) prior to the Company’s insolvency.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Companies Act 2006 (UK), HM Revenue and Customs (UK)
    Authors:
    Ian McDonald , Devi Shah
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    PrimaCom – confirming the extraterritoriality of English schemes of arrangement
    2012-03-07

    Introduction

    Hildyard J’s recent sanctioning of the scheme of arrangement proposed by PrimaCom Holding GmbH (‘’PrimaCom’’), a German incorporated company whose creditors were domiciled outside of the UK, has reaffirmed the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the English courts in respect of schemes of arrangement and confirmed their status as a useful instrument for foreign companies looking to restructure1.  

    The process

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Companies Act 2006 (UK)
    Authors:
    Devi Shah , Dr. Marco Wilhelm
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Current page 31
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days