Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Cruel intentions: SDNY bankruptcy court holds mutual intent not required to plead state law actual fraud
    2011-08-15

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Fraud, Hedge funds, Limited liability partnership, Involuntary dismissal, Common law, Prima facie, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Juliana Oliveira , Elise Scherr Frejka
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Seventh Circuit dodges intra- and inter-circuit conflict regarding res judicata and bankruptcy
    2011-08-15

    MATRIX IV, INC. v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. OF CHICAGO (July 28, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fraud, Res judicata and issue estoppel, Estoppel, Summary offence, Common law, Collateral estoppel, Collusion, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 1970 (RICO) (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    Right of set-off trumps secured interest absent control agreement
    2007-02-19

    An appeals court in Kentucky has issued a reminder to secured lenders of the importance of drawing up control agreements that establish a lender’s interest in a debtor’s assets contained in depository accounts.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Accounts receivable, Interest, Limited liability company, Common law, Default (finance), Secured creditor, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    State court may not prohibit receivership defendant from filing for bankruptcy
    2007-02-28

    In re Corporateand Leisure Event Productions, Inc.,1 the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona held that a state court lacks the power to enter an order in a receivership proceeding preventing the receivership defendant from filing a petition in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Injunction, Fraud, Bright-line rule, Common law, Exclusive jurisdiction, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Third Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Carrier’s “Extended” Maritime Possessory Liens
    2016-05-09

    Summary of Holding

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Cozen O'Connor, Common law, Admiralty law, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark E. Felger , Simon E. Fraser
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cozen O'Connor
    Replevin: A Remedy for Creditors
    2016-04-21

    The Right of Replevin and What May Be Taken

    Tracing its roots back to the common law, replevin is not a novel concept. While the cause of action is simple—allowing for the recovery of personal property that is wrongfully detained—replevin can be confusing for some creditors. This article is a brief glance at the nuances of chapter 78, Florida Statutes, to demonstrate how replevin can be a valuable tool to creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Insolvency & Restructuring, Rogers Towers PA, Accounts receivable, Personal property, Common law
    Authors:
    Courtney Gaver
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Rogers Towers PA
    Collateral Estoppel Take Two: Bankruptcy Court Revisits Issue Preclusion in Adversary Proceeding
    2016-02-22

    In the Summer of 2014, we wrote about a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Michigan (the “Bankruptcy Court”) involving an intra-family squabble.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC, Estoppel, Common law, Collateral estoppel, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Patricia J. Scott
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC
    Existing guaranty extinguished by refinancing
    2007-09-13

    Lenders take note—a state court has held that in some circumstances a refinancing transaction can extinguish an original guarantee.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debt, Common law, Refinancing, Default (finance), Bankruptcy discharge, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Excess D&O policy rescinded based on fraudulent representations regarding solvency
    2007-08-13

    The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, applying Ohio law, has held that an insurer could rescind an insurance policy based on an individual's fraudulent statements that the insured company was not facing bankruptcy. Unencumbered Assets Trust v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 2007 WL 2029063 (S.D. Ohio July 10, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Indictment, Common law, Annual report, US Securities and Exchange Commission, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Southern District of Ohio
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    District Court holds that bankruptcy claims purchased in good faith are not subject to equitable subordination claims
    2007-10-01

    Organizations that acquire claims in bankruptcy should acquire such claims by a sale without knowledge of the debtors’ claims against the original holder or prior transferees, and obtain an indemnification from the transferor of such claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McDermott Will & Emery, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Good faith, Common law, Distressed securities, Citibank, Enron, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McDermott Will & Emery

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Current page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Page 18
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days