Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Distributions from an investment advisor to its customers may not be protected transactions under Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code
    2013-01-24

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Security (finance), Safe harbor (law), Commodity, Liquidation, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Luke A. Sizemore
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Protecting utilities: would you believe a bill payment is a settlement payment under a forward contract?
    2012-12-20

    Lightfoot v. MX Energy Electric, Inc. (In re MBS Management Services, Inc.), 690 F.3d 352 (5th Cir. 2012) –

    The bankruptcy trustee of a property management company sought to recover money paid to a power company prior to bankruptcy as an avoidable preference.  The Fifth Circuit agreed with both the bankruptcy court and the district court that the payments were settlement payments under a forward contract exempt from avoidance.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Commodity, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    “An intentionally tough law”: employment rights lost by “responsibly connected” individuals when their PACA-licensed companies became insolvent
    2012-10-06

    The Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930 (“PACA”)1 is deservedly renowned for its provisions creating a statutory trust on sold perishable commodities, and the products and revenues thereof. See 7 U.S.C. §499e. The PACA statutory trust can have dramatic consequences in the cases of bankrupt produce buyers; produce sellers often are paid in full, ahead of secured creditors holding liens on all inventory and accounts receivable. That is a story often told.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Accounts receivable, Commodity, US Department of Agriculture
    Authors:
    Craig Miller , Peter Isola
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
    Fifth Circuit applies safe harbor protection to power supply contract in real estate manager's bankruptcy
    2012-08-28

    On August 2, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Lightfoot v. MXEnergy Elec., Inc. (In re MBS Mgmt. Servs., Inc.), Case No. 11-30553 (5th Cir. 2012), holding that a real estate management company’s electricity supply contract qualified as a “forward contract”, payments on account of which are protected from avoidance as preferential transfers under the Bankruptcy Code’s “safe harbor” provisions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Commodity, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    SIPC trustee provides updates on prospective claims process
    2011-11-11

    Although no official claims process has been announced, on November 10 and 11, the Trustee and its counsel provided additional information to securities claimants of MF Global Inc. ("MFGI") on how the process will work. Additionally, the Trustee requested patience during the ongoing liquidation as it works towards developing the claims process and effectuating a bulk transfer of securities customers accounts.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Reed Smith LLP, Security (finance), Commodity, Liquidation, US Securities and Exchange Commission, US Department of Justice, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Elizabeth A. McGovern
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Account transfer in the event of an FCM liquidation
    2011-11-04

    This Client Alert addresses the impact on a customer of a futures commission merchant (FCM) with respect to his or her accounts held by that FCM prior to a filing for bankruptcy under Title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 (the Bankruptcy Code) by the FCM.

    Summary

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Latham & Watkins LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Commodity, Futures contract, Commodity broker, Liquidation, Pro rata, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee
    Authors:
    Peter Y. Malyshev , Jonathan T. Ammons , Mark A. Broude , Emily B. Menchel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    SIPC Trustee takes first steps to thaw frozen customer securities accounts
    2011-11-07

    On November 4, 2011, the SIPC Trustee took his first steps toward transferring frozen customer securities accounts held by MF Global Inc. ("MFGI") when he announced that he will be accepting proposals for the transfer of all customer securities accounts of MFGI (the "Securities Accounts") to another member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. This action is in addition to the steps the Trustee took last week to transfer certain segregated commodities accounts from MFGI to other futures commission merchants.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Security (finance), Discovery, Commodity, Liquidation, Due diligence, Balance sheet, Subpoena, Non-disclosure agreement, Memorandum opinion, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Elizabeth A. McGovern
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    A Loss for the Broccoli Bar: Fifth Circuit Rules that Attorneys’ Fees Cannot be Paid from PACA Trust Assets
    2016-03-30

    Depending on the nature of its business, a debtor may encounter issues associated with the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”), a statue designed to protect sellers of perishable produce. Recently, in Kingdom Fresh Produce, Inc. v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Debtor, Commodity, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Digging for Help: Key Issues in Metals Exploration Bankruptcies
    2016-02-22

    The past several years have not been kind to commodities exploration companies.  The price of gold dropped to $1,051/oz. in November 2015, a level that had not been seen since 2009.  Although the price of gold rebounded somewhat in January and February 2016 to just over $1,200/oz., the price has steadily decreased after peaking at $1,921/oz. in August 2011.  The price of silver has also decreased dramatically, with its price off 60% from the 2011 highs.  Copper has not escaped this trend, and was recently selling for just over half of its 2011 price.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Commodity
    Authors:
    Andrew M. Simon
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Providing notice under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act: get it exactly right, or risk not getting paid
    2015-06-15

    A recent decision by the District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina demonstrates just how important it is for parties asserting rights under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) to provide proper notice. Failing to correctly provide notice means that the creditor is not entitled to the PACA trust fund protections. In most cases, that will make the difference between getting paid in full and getting paid cents on the dollar.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kane Russell Coleman Logan PC, Commodity
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kane Russell Coleman Logan PC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Current page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days