Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Legal update: Claimant’s delay proves fatal when making application for relief from sanctions
    2016-07-19

    Goldcrest Distribution Ltd v (1) Charles Joseph McCole (2) Mary Orr McCole (3) Jeremy Willmont (Trustee in Bankruptcy of Charles Joseph McCole)

    This case concerned the Claimant’s conduct in its application for relief from sanction following a successful default judgment hearing and in the litigation process more generally. The Claimant applied to set aside a default judgment entered against it by the Second Defendant after the Claimant failed to file a defence to a counterclaim.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kingsley Napley, Credit (finance), Surety, Debtor, Default judgment, Undue influence, Beneficial interest, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Kingsley Napley
    MF Global UK Limited (in special administration) CVA Proposal
    2017-12-20

    The special administrators of MFGUK have come up with a CVA proposal for its remaining ordinary creditors, which will enable the winding-up of the estate to the benefit of the creditors.

    The administrators have made a number of material settlements and realisations during the administration, simplifying the estate and permitting distributions to ordinary unsecured creditors of 90p in the pound.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ashfords LLP, Beneficial interest
    Authors:
    David Pomeroy , Alan Bennett , Olivia Bridger , Iona Jones , Kyla Payne
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    An A to Z of enforcing a UK money judgment
    2018-01-09

    Attachment of earnings - money is paid directly from the judgment debtor’s wages/salary into court by the debtor’s employer to satisfy the judgment debt.

    Bankruptcy proceedings - you can currently apply to make an individual judgment debtor bankrupt for a judgment debt in excess of £5,000. The limit is £500 for applying to put a company into liquidation. The nuclear options.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP, Brexit, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Beneficial interest
    Authors:
    Richard Marshall , Clare Arthurs
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP
    Finance litigation: the latest cases and issues in November 2017
    2017-11-28

    Gowling WLG's finance litigation experts bring you the latest on the cases and issues affecting the lending industry.

    Interests of bankrupt's creditors remain paramount

    In Pickard and another (Joint Trustees in Bankruptcy of Constable) v Constable, the question before the court was how exceptional the circumstances had to be to postpone an order for possession and sale of a property in which the bankrupt had a 50% share.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gowling WLG, Beneficial interest, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Turon Miah , Ian Weatherall
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    No standing in Bankruptcy Court for holder of certificated interest in real estate mortgage investment conduit
    2011-04-21

    In re Innkeepers USA Trust, et al., -- B.R. --, 2011 WL 1206173 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, Bond (finance), Debtor, Interest, Mortgage loan, Standing (law), Limited partnership, Debtor in possession, Preferred stock, Secured loan, Beneficial interest, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sullivan & Worcester LLP
    A 'settlement payment' is a settlement payment, don't settle for less!
    2011-06-30

    Enron seems like ancient history but the Second Circuit has just issued an important decision in an Enron appeal confirming that the redemption of commercial paper made through DTC is entitled to the Bankruptcy Code § 546(e) exemption for “settlement payments” and, therefore, exempt from attack as preferential transfers. The Second Circuit held that this is so even though the Enron redemption payments were made prior to stated maturity, becoming the first Circuit Court of Appeal to address this issue. Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. v. Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bracewell LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Fraud, Safe harbor (law), Market liquidity, Federal Reporter, Debt, Maturity (finance), Preferred stock, Beneficial interest, Commercial paper, Enron, Investment Company Act 1940 (USA), Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bracewell LLP
    1031 exchange agreements: drafting failure can lead to unsecured status
    2009-07-08

    A Virginia bankruptcy court has issued a decision that should be a major eye-opener for any entity that engages in tax-free exchanges under section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Breach of contract, Interest, Liability (financial accounting), Beneficial interest, Internal Revenue Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jeanne S. Lofgren
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Defense costs advanced under interim funding agreement deemed property of debtor's estate
    2009-07-27

    The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has affirmed a bankruptcy court's ruling that defense costs advanced by an insurer to a debtor under an Interim Fee Advancement and Non-Waiver Agreement (the Interim Agreement) were not held in trust and, therefore, constituted property of the debtor's estate. Great Am. Ins. Co. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. (In re Bally Total Fitness of Greater N.Y.), No. 09-CV-4052, 2009 WL 1684022 (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2009).

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Debtor, Waiver, Beneficial interest, Constitution, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Payments by Enron are "settlement payments" under the Bankruptcy Code's safe harbor provisions
    2011-07-18

    The Second Circuit Court of Appeals Protects Payments Made by Enron to Redeem Commercial Paper Prior to Maturity as “Settlement Payments" Under the Bankruptcy Code's Safe Harbor Provisions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Fraud, Safe harbor (law), Debt, Market value, Beneficial interest, Commercial paper, US Congress, Enron, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    David A. Zdunkewicz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Weathering the storm: Second Circuit affirms an expansive interpretation of Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code
    2011-07-25

    On June 28, 2011, in In re Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. v. Alfa,1 the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that Enron’s redemption of its commercial paper prior to maturity fell within the definition of a “settlement payment” and was protected from avoidance under § 546(e)’s safe harbor provision in Title 11 of the United States Code.2

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Haynes and Boone LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Safe harbor (law), Debt, Remand (court procedure), Market value, Beneficial interest, Commercial paper, ING Group, Enron, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Current page 2
    • Page 3
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days