Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Court finds investment advisor’s payments to customers are not exempt from avoidance under section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code
    2013-03-07

    FCStone, a New York-based commodities brokerage firm, was recently ordered to return a transfer of $15.6 million to the bankruptcy estate of Sentinel Management Group. Approximately $1.1 million of this amount constituted a prepetition transfer of proceeds the debtor obtained from the sale of securities, which proceeds the debtor distributed to a certain segment of its customers, including FCStone.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Commodity
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Tribal corporate bankruptcy petition raises issues of first impression for bankruptcy court
    2013-03-07

    On March 4, 2013, ‘SA’ NYU WA, Inc., a tribally-chartered corporation wholly owned by the Hualapai Indian Tribe, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Arizona. This is a very important case for tribes and any party conducting business with tribes because the petition will raise a question of first impression for the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court will have to decide whether a tribal corporation is eligible to be a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Christine L. Swanick , Wilda Wahpepah
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    An insider’s guide to evading absolute priority? Seventh Circuit: new value competition requirements apply to insiders
    2013-03-07

    In Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, the absolute priority rule requires a debtor’s creditors be paid in full before equity investors receive any value. However, existing equity investors occasionally seek to invest new money in the plan of reorganization process and argue that such investment justifies retention of equity in the reorganized company; equity which otherwise would pass to impaired creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Secured creditor, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Eric R. Blythe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Too cool for school specialty - alternative DIP financing allows educational company to avoid immediate sale
    2013-03-04

    The School Specialty chapter 11 case began in what has become all too typical fashion. The company, overleveraged and short of cash, had no choice but to accept a lifeline extended by its second lien secured lender, a private investment fund. The terms of the debtor in possession (“DIP”) financing

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Investment funds
    Authors:
    Benjamin D. Feder
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    What a trademark licensee can do to improve its chances of retaining its trademark rights after the licensor files bankruptcy
    2013-03-04

    Fashion industry licensees invest substantial sums in reliance on their license rights. Bankrupt licensors have been able to convince courts they can “reject” licenses and, when so doing, thereby cause licensees’ trademark rights to vaporize. Here we discuss why and what a licensee can do.

    The Effect of Rejection on Trademark License Rights

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Mary Lane
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP
    What goes up … a quick glance at Ohio oil and gas leases in bankruptcy
    2013-03-05

    As Ohio enjoys its latest boom in oil and gas exploration, it is important to understand how oil and gas leases are treated in bankruptcy. Unsettled Ohio law regarding whether a debtor owns unextracted oil and gas as part of the debtor’s real property can make this a difficult issue. 

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Andrew S. Nicoll
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
    Covenant not to sue is not discharged in bankruptcy
    2013-02-28

    The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, equating a covenant not to sue under a patent with a license, has concluded that a trustee in bankruptcy cannot unilaterally reject the covenant as an executory contract.  In re Spansion, Case Nos. 11-3323, -3324 (3rd Cir., Dec. 21, 2012) (Scirica, J.).

    Spansion and Apple settled a patent dispute at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) regarding flash memory products, with Spansion agreeing to dismiss its case and to refrain from filing related actions.  In pertinent part, the agreement stated:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patents, McDermott Will & Emery, Bankruptcy, Apple Inc, US International Trade Commission, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McDermott Will & Emery
    Fifth Circuit rejects “artificial impairment” standard in confirmation of single asset real estate plan
    2013-03-01

    In a pro-debtor opinion released on February 26, 2013, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a debtor may “artificial impair” claims in a class to obtain an impaired and accepting class of claims as required by section 1129(a)(10) of the Bankruptcy Code. Western Real Estate Equities, L.L.C. v. Village at Camp Bowie I, L.P. (In re Village at Camp Bowie I, L.P.), No. 12-10271, 2013 WL 690497 (5th Cir. Feb. 26, 2013).

    Statutory Background to the Artificial Impairment Issue

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, King & Spalding LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Secured creditor, Title 11 of the US Code, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Edward L. Ripley , Mark W. Wege , Eric English
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    King & Spalding LLP
    AMR decision highlights bankruptcy court split on enforceability of ipso facto clauses
    2013-02-20

    A recent ruling in the American Airlines bankruptcy case enforcing an automatic acceleration upon bankruptcy provision serves as a reminder that the enforceability of so-called ipso facto provisions in debt instruments remains an unsettled, forum-dependent question.      

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, American Airlines, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Leonard Weiser-Varon
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Bankruptcy court upholds post-petition plan support agreement
    2013-02-25

    On January 31, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware confirmed the debtors’ proposed plan of reorganization in In re Indianapolis Downs, LLC,1 declining to “designate” or disallow the votes of several substantial creditors that had entered into a plan support or “lockup” agreement with the debtors after the bankruptcy filing. In a written decision,2 the Bankruptcy Court provided important guidance concerning the permissibility of post-petition plan support agreements entered into before the court approves a disclosure statement.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Debevoise & Plimpton, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Solicitation, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Richard F. Hahn , Jae-Sun Chung , Kevin Bensley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Debevoise & Plimpton

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 346
    • Page 347
    • Page 348
    • Page 349
    • Current page 350
    • Page 351
    • Page 352
    • Page 353
    • Page 354
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days