Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Indalex priority case decided — Ontario Court of Appeal gives priority to pension plan deficiency over secured lenders
    2011-04-08

    This week, the Ontario Court of Appeal surprised many by deciding that in the context of the CCAA proceedings of Indalex, pension plan deficiency claims can have priority over security held by secured DIP lenders. The Court granted priority for the entire wind-up deficiency of two pension plans over the DIP lender’s security. If not reversed on appeal, the ruling creates a potential worst case scenario for secured lenders in Ontario and could affect availability of credit for all employers who provide defined benefit pension plans for their employees.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Conflict of interest, Credit (finance), Debtor, Fiduciary, Stakeholder (corporate), Defined benefit pension plan, Parent company, Secured loan, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Kevin P. McElcheran
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Deemed Trust for Unremitted Withholdings Trumps Interim Financing Charge in Recent Nova Scotia Supreme Court Decision
    2017-08-31

    In the recent decision of Rosedale Farms Limited, Hassett Holdings Inc., Resurgam Resources (Re) (“Rosedale”), the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia held that a deemed trust for unremitted withholdings under sections 227(4)

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Canada Revenue Agency
    Authors:
    Audrey Bouffard-Nesbitt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Who owns a Québec partnership?
    2010-11-29

    In Ferme CGR Enr, senc (Syndic de) 2010 QCCA 719, the Québec Court of Appeal decided that it is not necessary to put the partners of a Québec general partnership into bankruptcy when the partnership itself is put into bankruptcy. In doing so, the court initially relied upon authorities interpreting the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. In addition, the court supported its decision with an analysis of the legal nature of Québec general partnerships and, as a result, modified the ownership structure of partnerships in Québec.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Quebec, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Legal personality, Interest, Debt, Personal property, Limited partnership, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Arbitration versus the “Single Proceeding Model” in Insolvency Proceedings - Which prevails?
    2022-06-09

    Overview and Why This Case Matters

    Filed under:
    Canada, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), UNCITRAL, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Alberta Court clarifies ranking of linear property tax claims
    2017-07-28

    A recent unreported decision in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench has clarified the ranking of certain municipal tax claims against a bankrupt in Alberta. In Bank of Nova Scotia et al v. Virginia Hills Oil Corp.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Life sciences collaborations - recent amendments to the BIA and the CCAA and the use of bankruptcy remote entities
    2009-10-31

    Amendments to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) have recently come into force that purportedly protect licensees of intellectual property (IP) if their licensors become insolvent or bankrupt. There are, however, a number of uncertainties surrounding the scope of protection afforded by these amendments. Until these uncertainties are resolved, licensees may wish to consider augmenting their statutory rights by contractual and other legal mechanisms. A Bankruptcy Remote Entity (BRE) is one potential mechanism.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Foreclosure, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench rules that end-of-life environmental obligations are not always first in priority, in contrast to the landmark Redwater decision
    2021-04-29

    The recent decision of Justice B.E.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Sean F. Collins , Walker W. MacLeod , Nathan Stewart
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Court of Appeal upholds Redwater decision
    2017-04-25

    In a majority two to one decision released on April 24, 2017, the Alberta Court of Appeal has upheld the lower court ruling in Re Redwater Energy Corporation.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Alberta Energy Regulator, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    Sean F. Collins , Walker W. MacLeod , Pantelis Kyriakakis
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Canadian restructuring proceedings
    2009-07-23

    In Canada, there is more than one insolvency regime available to an insolvent company that wishes to restructure its debts and operations. However, the most commonly used regime for large companies ? and sometimes for smaller companies, because it is the most flexible ? is the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA). The most commonly used regime for smaller companies or less complicated restructurings is proposal proceedings under theBankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (BIA).

    CCAA

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Debt restructuring, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Canada Business Corporations Act 1985
    Authors:
    James D. Gage , Kevin P. McElcheran , Heather L. Meredith
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Highlights of 2019 Canadian Restructuring Law
    2020-01-13

    2019 was a busy year for corporate restructuring practitioners in Canada. The year saw an uptick in CCAA filings nationwide, with 38 total proceedings (up from the total of 21 filings in 2018). The Canadian restructuring landscape also some significant shake-ups, with important decisions and extensive legislative changes. The highlights are summarized below:

    BIA & CCAA Amended

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Debtor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Court of Appeal of Alberta, Quebec Court of Appeal
    Authors:
    Alexander Steele
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 39
    • Page 40
    • Page 41
    • Page 42
    • Page 43
    • Current page 44
    • Page 45
    • Page 46
    • Page 47
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days