Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    SCC confirms no crown priority for unremitted GST/QST in a bankruptcy
    2009-12-10

    On October 30, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-anticipated decision in Quebec (Revenue) v. Caisse populaire Desjardins de Montmagny. At issue in this case (and two companion cases) was the legal characterization of Crown rights with respect to collected but unremitted GST and Quebec sales tax (QST) in the hands of a trustee in bankruptcy. The Supreme Court confirmed that the Crown is an ordinary unsecured creditor with respect to such amounts, subject to the rights of prior ranking security holders.

    Summary of Facts

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, Excise, Tax deduction, Secured creditor, Goods and services tax (Canada), Unsecured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of Canada, Quebec Court of Appeal
    Authors:
    Barry N. Segal , Virginie Gauthier
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    Canadian insolvency law amendments: focus for equipment financiers
    2009-10-27

    On September 17, 2009 our firm published a summary of recent amendments (the "Amendments") to Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") and Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"). This summary provided a detailed review of the significant legislative changes that were brought into force on September 18, 2009.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Asset Finance, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Debtor, Personal property, Common law, Secured creditor, Credit rating agency, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Joseph Bellissimo , Jonathan Fleisher
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Focus for equipment financiers
    2009-10-29

    On September 17, 2009 our firm published a summary of recent amendments (the "Amendments") to Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") and Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"). This summary provided a detailed review of the significant legislative changes that were brought into force on September 18, 2009.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Debtor, Personal property, Common law, Secured creditor, Credit rating agency, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Joseph Bellissimo , Jonathan Fleisher
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Comparing US and Canadian rules for debt forgiveness
    2009-10-29

    In the current recession, some North American businesses facing difficulty in meeting their debt obligations may consider the implications of restructuring their debt in Canada or the US. The rules in the two jurisdictions have some similarities, but also some significant differences that should be examined in any such restructuring.

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Interest, Taxable income, Debt, Debt relief, Fair market value, Default (finance), Preferred stock, Bankruptcy discharge, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Lorne H. Saltman
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Life sciences collaborations - recent amendments to the BIA and the CCAA and the use of bankruptcy remote entities
    2009-10-31

    Amendments to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) have recently come into force that purportedly protect licensees of intellectual property (IP) if their licensors become insolvent or bankrupt. There are, however, a number of uncertainties surrounding the scope of protection afforded by these amendments. Until these uncertainties are resolved, licensees may wish to consider augmenting their statutory rights by contractual and other legal mechanisms. A Bankruptcy Remote Entity (BRE) is one potential mechanism.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Foreclosure, Biotechnology, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Paul Armitage
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Coming into force date for the unproclaimed amendments to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA)
    2009-11-03

    The Federal Government has announced that September 18, 2009 has been established as the coming-into-force date for most of the remaining unproclaimed amendments to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie, US Federal Government, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    New bankruptcy law amendments may impact securitization
    2009-11-23

    On September 18, 2009, a number of amendments to Canada's Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and Companies Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) came into force. The amendments were passed in 2005 and 2007 but, aside from a few provisions that became effective in July 2008, the amendments sat dormant, awaiting proclamation into force. Pursuant to Order in Council P.C. 2009-1207, almost all of these amendments have now been brought into force. Some of these provisions will be of interest to participants in the securitization market.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Securitization & Structured Finance, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Debtor, Security (finance), Interest, Over-the-counter (finance), Personal property, Contract for difference, Ontario Securities Commission, Bank of Canada, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Mark E. McElheran , Philip J. Henderson
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
    New bankruptcy law amendments will help IP licensees
    2009-10-15

    On September 18, 2009, many long-awaited amendments to Canada's Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) came into force. One of these new provisions will help protect intellectual property (IP) licensees in the event of the bankruptcy of their licensors.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Common law, Exclusive right, Title 11 of the US Code, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
    Bankruptcy and insolvency law amendments declared in force
    2009-10-20

    Insolvency law amendments were declared in force as of September 18, 2009 (the “Amendments”). The Amendments were contained in bills which received Royal assent on November 25, 2005 and on December 14, 2007, but the Amendments were not proclaimed into force until now.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fair market value, Secured creditor, Prejudice, UNCITRAL, Title 11 of the US Code, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Eric Sherkin
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    "If only you had come to us sooner" - strategies for avoiding insolvency
    2009-10-20

    We know this publication is about dispute resolution, but what we really want to talk about in this article is avoiding insolvency and bankruptcy disputes.

    “If Only You Had Come to Us Sooner”

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Bankruptcy, Board of directors, Debt, Dispute resolution, Liquidation, Cashflow, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Chief financial officer
    Authors:
    Magnus C. Verbrugge
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • Page 24
    • Page 25
    • Current page 26
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days