Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    SCOTUS term in review
    2024-07-25

    Weil's Appellate & Strategic Counseling group welcomes you to Weil's SCOTUS Term Review. Here, we summarize and analyze the cases from the 2023 Supreme Court Term that are most germane to our clients' businesses.

    Filed under:
    USA, Arbitration & ADR, Capital Markets, Corporate Finance/M&A, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, US Securities and Exchange Commission, US Food and Drug Administration, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (USA), Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA), False Claims Act 1863 (USA), Americans with Disabilities Act 1990 (USA), Administrative Procedure Act, Federal Arbitration Act 1926 (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, Financial services banks, Financial services corporate, Hardware, devices & electronic equipment, Media, Software & SAAS, Technology
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    In the courts
    2010-08-09
    • On August 4, 2010, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a Wisconsin federal district court’s ruling on the Wisconsin bankruptcy court’s disposition of three of Telephone and Data Systems’ (TDS) claims, and the FCC’s objections thereto, filed in Airadigm’s Chapter 11 reorganization plan. The principal assets at issue were a series of C- and F-block spectrum licenses for mobile phone service in certain areas of Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan that Airadigm had won at auction in the late 1990s.
    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Telecoms, ArentFox Schiff, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Communications Commission (USA), Administrative Procedure Act, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Ross A. Buntrock , Jonathan E. Canis , Alan G. Fishel , Michael B. Hazzard , Stephanie A. Joyce , Jeffrey E. Rummel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    ArentFox Schiff
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days