On March 24, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.,No. 12-1408, holding that severance payments made to employees terminated in connection with a company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan are taxable wages under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA).
On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided Law v. Siegel, No. 12-5196. The Court held that the bankruptcy court violated the express terms of § 522 of the Bankruptcy Code when it ordered that the $75,000 protected by a debtor's homestead exemption be available to pay a trustee's attorney's fees as an administrative expense. The order exceeded the limits of the bankruptcy court's authority under § 105(a) of the Code and its inherent powers.
Earlier this week, the English Court of Appeal overturned the recent decisions in Goldacre (Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2009] EWCH 3389 (Ch);2011 Ch 455) and Luminar (Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd v Luminar Lava Ignite [2012] EWCH 951 (Ch)) regarding the treatment of rent in an administration.
In Crystal Palace FC Ltd v Kavanagh & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1410, the Court of Appeal considered whether dismissals made by an administrator to keep a business alive with the ultimate aim of selling it were automatically unfair under TUPE, in which case liability would pass to the buyer.
On May 13, 2013, the Supreme Court decided Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., No. 11-1518. Under 11 U.S.C.
I am the director of a corporate hospitality agency that has become insolvent. I still have a lot of goodwill with my clients and am keen not to lose the book of contacts I have built up in this industry. Can you tell me whether there is anything to stop me from forming a new company from the remains of my failed business and opening up again under a different name?
David Rubin and Henry Lan; administrators of Capitol Films v Cobalt Pictures and 24 others [2010] EWHC 3223 (Ch).
On May 29, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided RadLAX Gateway Hotel LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 11-166, holding that a Chapter 11 debtor may not obtain confirmation of a "cramdown" plan under 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(a) that provides for the sale of collateral free and clear of a secured creditor's lien but that does not permit the creditor to credit-bid at the asset sale (that is, offset the purchase price by the amount of the debt owed).
On May 14, 2012, the Supreme Court decided Hall v. United States, No. 10-875, holding that a federal income tax liability resulting from the postpetition sale of an individual debtor's farm during the pendency of a Chapter 12 bankruptcy is not "incurred by the estate" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(B)(i) and therefore is not dischargeable in the bankruptcy.
For employers to understand the big picture, our earlier posts described the government subsidies, individual