Fulltext Search
A Deep Dive into 2023's Insolvency Regime - Part 3 of 5

Continuing our exploration of the evolving insolvency landscape in 2023, Part 3 delves into two more landmark cases that further define the legal contours of insolvency proceedings in India.

M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank & Ors

Clarification on NCLT's Discretion in Admitting Section 7 Applications

India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
A Deep Dive into 2023's Insolvency Regime- Part 2 of 5

As we continue our journey through the evolving insolvency landscape of 2023, we will delve into two landmark cases that further shaped the legal framework governing insolvency proceedings in India. Building upon the foundations laid in Part 1 of this series, we now turn our attention to M/s. Next Education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. K12 Techno Services Pvt. Ltd and Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka v. Tourism Finance Corporation India Ltd.

M/s. Next Education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. K12 Techno Services Pvt. Ltd.

India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Insolvency, Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 (India), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
A Deep Dive into 2023's Insolvency Regime- Part 1 of 5

In the intricate tapestry of corporate insolvency, the year 2023 unfurled a saga of legal intricacies that left an indelible mark on the evolving insolvency landscape in India. This blog, the first of a five-part series, will be exploring the cases that not only shaped the insolvency regime but also defined pivotal aspects of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). From the sectors affected to the geographical intricacies, we'll dissect the diverse facets that contributed to the evolution of insolvency laws. Additionally, we'll analyze two significant cases – RPS Infrastructure Ltd. v.

India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Liquidation, Coronavirus, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of the United States
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under IBC will commence on the date of pronouncement of order or from the date when contents are known to the aggrieved party?

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (New Delhi Bench) (“NCLAT”) in two recent judgments passed in Raiyan Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Unrivalled Projects Pvt. Ltd. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1071 of 2023] and Aryan Mining & Trading Corpn Pvt. Ltd. vs Kail limited and Anr. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.

India, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Insolvency, Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under IBC will commence on the date of pronouncement of order or from the date when contents are known to the aggrieved party?

INTRODUCTION: 

India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Insolvency, Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
Galapagos Group Restructuring Prevails Over Junior Creditor Challenge

The Galapagos Group has secured comprehensive affirmation of its 2019 debt restructuring (the “Restructuring”) from the English High Court. This decision is a significant step towards resolution of the highly contested restructuring, and provides market participants with further clarity and certainty when it comes to implementing lender-led transactions in future.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
German share pledge enforcement: German Federal Supreme Court finally provides clarification on who is entitled to enforce

Since the beginning of the 21st century and the first big wave of security enforcements in Germany, who holds the entitlement to enforce a share pledge has caused countless disputes between pledgees and insolvency administrators. This issue has now been resolved by a recently released judgment of the German Federal Supreme Court of 27 Oct 2022 (case no.: IX ZR 145/21), which has now held that pledged shares as well as pledges over certain other non-movable rights such as trademarks or patents can be enforced by the pledgee (only) and not by the administrator.

Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
German share pledge enforcement: German Federal Supreme Court finally provides clarification on who is entitled to enforce

Since the beginning of the 21st century and the first big wave of security enforcements in Germany, who holds the entitlement to enforce a share pledge between pledgees and insolvency administrators has caused countless disputes. This issue has now been resolved by a recently released judgment of the German Federal Supreme Court of 27 Oct 2022 (case no.: IX ZR 145/21), which has now held that pledged shares as well as pledges over certain other non-movable rights such as trademarks or patents can be enforced by the pledgee (only) and not by the administrator.

Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
Winter Wears On: Celsius Court Rules That Certain Customer Deposits are Property of the Bankruptcy Estate

Introduction

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Real Estate, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Cryptocurrency, FTX
How Many Connections are Too Many? Bankruptcy Court Finds Multiple Attenuated Connections Not Enough to Warrant Disqualification of Debtors’ Professional

Introduction

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court