Fulltext Search
Extensions of shelf life of voidable transactions claims – recent High Court decisions

On 11 March 2015, the High Court delivered the following significant decisions (Grant Samuel Corporate Finance v Fletcher [2015] HCA 8 and Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) II Pty Ltd v Fletcher [2015] HCA 10) in relation to s588FF(3) of theCorporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Johnson Winter Slattery, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Special purpose liquidator of One.Tel granted release under the Corporations Act

In the matter of One.Tel Limited (in liquidation) [2014] NSWSC 1892

Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Johnson Winter Slattery, Liquidator (law), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Bankruptcy Court in Delaware rules Caesars’ bankruptcy cases belong in Chicago despite involuntary petition in Delaware

In a battle over proper venue for the chapter 11 cases of In re Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Bankruptcy, United States bankruptcy court
Second Circuit holds that equitable mootness doctrine applies to appeals from orders confirming liquidating chapter 11 plans

On October 29, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing as equitably moot appeals filed by three individuals (the “Appellants”) in the chapter 11 case of In re BGI Inc. f/k/a Borders Group, Inc.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Liquidation, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
Australian freezing orders valid ahead of foreign judgments

In the recent decision of Pt Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd [2014] WASCA 178, the Western Australian Court of Appeal unanimously found that the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) (RSC) were valid insofar as they empower the Court to ‘freeze’ local assets ahead of a possible foreign judgment.

Australia, Western Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Johnson Winter Slattery
Liquidator's lien prevails over secured creditor

Introduction

Australia, Victoria, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Johnson Winter Slattery, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, Victoria Supreme Court
Validly constituted committees of inspection

Owen, in the Matter of RiverCity Motorway Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (“RiverCity”) [2014] FCA 1008

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Johnson Winter Slattery
District of Delaware attributes value to Debtor’s credit facility in denying a fraudulent transfer claim based on unreasonably small capital despite existing basis for lenders to terminate and subsequent termination of the facility

On September 30, 2014, in In re SemCrude, L.P.,1 the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, held that direct partnership distributions by debtor SemGroup, L.P. (the “Debtor”) and indirect partnership distributions by its general partner, SemGroup G.P., L.L.C., to certain limited and general partners could not be avoided as constructive fraudulent transfers.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Line of credit
Quadrant v. Vertin: duty to maximize value of an insolvent enterprise—business judgment rule applies to interested directors’ “risky” strategy to increase value, even though creditors bear the downside and the controller stands to benefit

In Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. Vertin (October 1, 2014), Vice Chancellor Laster clarified the Delaware Chancery Court’s approach to breach of fiduciary duty derivative actions brought by creditors against the directors of an insolvent corporation.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Business judgement rule, Delaware Court of Chancery
Second Circuit holds that a sale by a chapter 15 debtor in a foreign main proceeding of a claim against an obligor located in the U.S. must be reviewed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code

On September 26, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, overturning decisions by the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court for the Southern District of New York, held that the Bankruptcy Court was required to review under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code the transfer of a claim by a chapter 15 debtor with a recognized foreign main proceeding pending in the British Virgin Islands (the “BVI”).1     In a case under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code in which a foreign main proceeding has been recognized, section 1520(a)(2) of the Bankr

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court