It is not uncommon for firms to use standard language in their account agreements that creates liens on Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Two recent federal court decisions, however, suggest that granting such a lien on an IRA may constitute a prohibited transaction that causes these accounts to lose their tax exempt status, which in turn could potentially make IRAs subject to third-party creditor claims. These two decisions could have far-reaching implications for any firm that has used or still uses similar lien-creating language in their account agreements.
Taking the lead from its recent decision in In re River Road Hotel Partners,1 in In re River East Plaza, LLC,2 the Seventh Circuit held that a debtor cannot avoid the lien retention prong of Section 1129(b)(2)(A)(i)3 by transferring an undersecured creditor’s lien to substitute collateral as indubitable equivalence pursuant to Section 1129(b)(2)(A)(iii).
最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国企业破产法》若干问题的规定（一）(09/09/2011)
Overview of Insolvency Rules and Restructuring Procedures Pursuant to Italian Bankruptcy Law
In re GALP Highcross Limited Partnership (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Case no. 11-36741
In re GALP Waters Limited Partnership (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Case no. 11-36743
In re Culver Village, LLC (Bankr. C.D. Cal.) Case no. 11-46359
In re Provo Gateway, LLC (Bankr. D. Utah) Case no. 11-31259
In re Gelt Financial Corporation (Bankr. E.D. Pa.) Case no. 11-15827
In re East Coast Abatement Co. Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Va.) Case no. 11-73560
In re Summer View Sherman Oaks Apartments, LLC (Bankr. C.D. Cal.) Case no. 11-19800