The remaining credit after the cancelation of its guarantee through an assignment in lieu of payment (dación en pago) in favor of a creditor with a lower-ranking guarantee is an ordinary credit and cannot be subject to a new classification
The insolvency administration is authorized to sell the production unit of the insolvent company Antibióticos, S.A.U. to Black Toro Capital S.A.R.L.
It’s always risky when the Supreme Court grants certiorari in a bankruptcy case. While the Court’s opinion may bring clarity to the narrow question upon which certiorari was granted, it often creates a host of unintended problems in other areas.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice of 1 July 2014
This judgment concludes that the Insolvency Plan is an alternative corporate recovery measure which aims to satisfy the interests of the creditors, which applies indiscriminately to natural and to legal persons. When the insolvent is a natural person, the fact that the liquidation of its assets within the insolvency proceedings took place without the full payment of the claims, is still not enough to declare the release of the debtor.
On 27 July 2014, the Regulation (UE) n.º 655/2014, of the European Parliament and of the Council (the “Regulation”), establishing a European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters was published.
Judge Drain’s recent decision confirming the Momentive Performance Materials Inc. plan is just the latest in a series of recent cases involving “make whole” premiums. As in several of the recent cases, the lenders lost because the contract did not clearly enough provide for the make whole premium in the event of an acceleration rather than prepayment.
INTRODUCTION
A bankruptcy court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to determine a tax refund claim under Section 505(a)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code where the refund was requested by a liquidating trustee appointed pursuant to a plan, as opposed to a pre-confirmation bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession, the Second Circuit held in United States v. Bond, Docket No. 12-4803 (2nd Cir. Aug. 13, 2014).
Financial institutions are not de facto directors of the insolvent company because they do not significantly affect the performance of the insolvent company’s activity, but only ensure that certain costs do not affect the repayment of their loan.
The extension of the term for the delivery of works not authorized by the guarantor that had secured the penalty for delay does not harm it and, therefore, the guarantee is not extinguished; any increase in the penalty agreed does not extinguish the guarantee, but cannot be enforceable on the guarantor that will be liable in the terms agreed in the initial agreement. This decision discussed the effects on the guarantee of the novation of the secured obligation agreed without the guarantor’s knowledge.