Fulltext Search
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Finds Bar Date Applies to Pension Fund’s Withdrawal Liability Claim Before Withdrawal Occurs

The Bottom Line

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York entered a decision confirming the applicability of the Court’s bar date order as it relates to a pension fund’s claim for withdrawal liability filed after the bar date, despite the fact that the withdrawal occurred after the deadline for filing proofs of claim.

What Happened?

USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Mutual fund, Investment funds, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York Dismisses Securities Law Claims on Grounds of International Comity; No Chapter 15 Proceeding Required

The Bottom Line

Canada, USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Fifth Circuit Analyzes Creditor’s Impairment, Entitlements to Contractual Make-Whole and Post-Petition Interest Under Solvent-Debtor Chapter 11 Plan

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
Priority Denied: Alberta Court of Appeal Determines Linear Property Tax Arrears Are Not Subject to a Special Lien

On February 12, 2019, the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Court) released its long-anticipated decision in Northern Sunrise County v. Virginia Hills Oil Corp. (Virginia Hills).

Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Tax, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, Court of Appeal of Alberta
Improper Purpose by a Creditor? The Quebec Court of Appeal Weighs In

On February 4, 2019, the Quebec Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) ruled in the restructuring proceedings of Bluberi Gaming Technologies Inc., now 9354‑9186 Québec Inc., et al. (Bluberi) that under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (CCAA), creditors have a right to vote in their own self-interest. In so doing, the Court of Appeal reversed the lower court’s decision.

Canada, Quebec, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, Quebec Court of Appeal
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York Holds That Bankruptcy Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Fraudulent Transfer Action Even If Defendant-Creditor Withdraws Proof of Claim

The Bottom Line

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Fifth Circuit Disallows Make-Whole Payment in Bankruptcy

On Jan. 19, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated a bankruptcy court decision awarding Ultra Petroleum Corp. noteholders $201 million in make-whole payments and $186 million in post-petition interest. Under the note agreement, upon a bankruptcy filing, the issuer is obligated for a make-whole amount equal to the discounted value of the remaining scheduled payments (including principal and interest that would be due after prepayment) less the principal amount of the notes.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Fifth Circuit
Fifth Circuit Holds That Creditor Lacks Constitutional Standing to Appeal

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, ING Group, Fifth Circuit
Supreme Court of Canada Overturns Alberta Court of Appeal in Redwater Decision

On January 31, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Orphan Well Association, et. al. v. Grant Thornton Limited, et. al. – a case commonly known as Redwater.

Canada, Alberta, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal of Alberta
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Finds that Section 546(e) Does Not Protect Fraudulent Transfers Following Supreme Court’s Ruling in Merit Management

The Bottom Line

In one of the first applications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the scope of section 546(e) in Merit Management, Delaware Bankruptcy Court Judge Carey found that section 546(e)’s safe harbor did not apply to fraudulent transfers between two parties that were not financial institutions, even if the transaction passed through financial intermediaries.

What Happened

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, United States bankruptcy court