The rescission was declared of a mortgage the insolvent company granted over a warehouse it owned in guarantee of the loan a credit institution had granted to a company of its group. The Supreme Court declared (i) that the contextual guarantee was for consideration and (ii) the need for proof of the profit (even indirect) of the guarantor company without merely belonging to the group sufficing, and confirmed that the rescission only affected the guarantee and not the loan.
SUPREME COURT RULING OF APRIL 9, 2014, NO. 175/2014: IN THE RESCISSION OF THE ASSIGNMENT IN PAYMENT AGREEMENT (DACIÓN EN PAGO), THE CREDIT OF THE NONDEFAULTING PARTY IS AN INSOLVENCY CLAIM AND NOT AGAINST THE INSOLVENCY ESTATE
The assignment in payment (dación en pago) of debt is an act extinguishing obligations and not a bilateral agreement. Therefore, its rescission leads to an insolvency claim for the non-defaulting party.
A creditors’ composition agreement has been approved for Pescanova, and section six of the insolvency proceedings (categorisation of the insolvency) has not been opened, as there is a type of creditor whose moratorium is less than three years and whose debt relief is below one third.
GRANADA COMMERCIAL COURT NO. 1 RULING OF MARCH 17, 2014; LOGROÑO COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 6 DECREE OF APRIL 25, 2014; BARCELONA COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 38 DECREE OF MAY 14, 2014; AND PONTEVEDRA COMMERCIAL COURT NO. 2 DECISION OF JUNE 6, 2014: FIRST DECISIONS ON THE SUSPENSION OF ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS UNDER ARTICLE 5 BIS OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT AFTER ROYAL DECREE-LAW 4/2014
BARCELONA PROVINCIAL COURT (DIVISION 15) RULING OF APRIL 3, 2014, NO.
116/2014, AND LA CORUNA PROVINCIAL COURT (DIVISION 4) RULING OF APRIL 22,
2014, NO. 118/2014: ARTICLE 90.1.6 OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT REFERS TO THE PLEDGE SECURING FUTURE CREDITS
Two new decisions on article 90.1.6 of the Insolvency Act coincide in stating that the last point of this precept refers to the pledge securing future credits, and not to the pledge over future credit rights.
(ORDONNANCE Nº 2014-326 DU 12 MARS 2014 ET DÉCRET NO 2014-736 DU 30 JUIN 2014)
La nouvelle ordonnance nº 2014-326 du 12 mars 2014 modifie avec environ 120 articles essentiellement insérés dans le Code de Commerce, le régime des entreprises en difficulté. Un décret d’application publié le 30 juin 2014 a précisé les détails de ce texte.
Nous exposons ici quelques points principaux de la réforme (liste non exhaustive) :
One deliberately ironic facet of the 2004 film Howard Hughes bio-pic The Aviator (the one with Leonardo DiCaprio) is the fact that the airlines fighting for world dominance in the 1940s were Howard Hughes’ TWA and Juan Trippe’s Pan Am. By the time of the movie, of course, both famous airlines were gone. Pan Am’s final descent into bankruptcy court ended in 1991. Following its own troubles (and two bankruptcies in the 1990s), TWA was acquired by American Airlines in 2001. But does the death of an airline mean an end to litigation? Of course not.
The health of the healthcare industry can be summarized as follows: as go federal reimbursement rates, so goes the financial viability of healthcare providers, whether hospitals, nursing homes or medical practices.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice of 20-03-2014 Standardization of Jurisprudence – Insolvency Proceedings – Right of Retention
Spanish Royal Decree-Law 4/2014, passed on March 7 2014, has considerably changed the rules for the court-sanctioning of so-called Spanish schemes of arrangement. Amongst those changes, the reform has lowered the majorities required to achieve a Spanish scheme. Currently, a majority of at least 51% of the financial liabilities held by all creditors at the time of the refinancing agreement (acuerdo de refinanciación) approval, will suffice to request the insolvency judge to sanction the agreement, so it is considered ringfenced and protected from any challenge for rescission.