Fulltext Search

简介

最近在Trinity Concept Ltd (In Liq) v Wong Kung Sang (黄共生) [2022] 1 HKLRD 1388一案中,原告人提出申索,要求被告人交代账目。被告人以有关诉讼没有在《时效条例》(香港法例第347章)第20(2) 条订明的六年诉讼时效内提出为由,申请剔除原告人的申索,但被原讼法庭(「法院」)驳回。

背景

Trinity Concept Ltd(「原告人」)是一间正在清盘的公司,它控告其两名前董事(「被告人」)违反受信责任,向第三方作出合共139笔付款而没有妥当解释(「可疑交易」)。原告人请求法院颁令被告人交代账目,并在制备账目后交出结欠的资产或付款,或命令被告人作出衡平法补偿。被告人认为可疑交易距离令状发出已超过六年,因此本案已丧失诉讼时效,应根据《时效条例》第4(2) 条予以驳回。

裁决

法院指出下列与剔除申请有关的重要问题:

Introduction

On 22 February 2022, Doyle J made a winding up order and appointed joint official liquidators in respect of GTI Holdings Limited (Company), a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. The winding up order was unopposed and Doyle J was satisfied that the company was insolvent. Nevertheless, in a judgment dated 15 March 2022,  Doyle J articulated the reasons for his hesitancy in making that winding up order.

Background

In the recent decision of Re Formation (Cayman) Fund I, L.P (unreported, 21 April 2022), Justice Kawaley held (notwithstanding the earlier decision of Justice Parker in Re Padma Fund L.P. (unreported, 8 October 2021) in respect of a creditor's petition) that a limited partner may petition to wind up an exempted limited partnership (ELP) on the just and equitable ground by presenting a petition against the ELP directly (rather than against the general partner), and that an ELP may be wound-up in the same manner as a company pursuant to Part V of the Compani

Introduction

The current geo-political climate is contributing to the rapid rise to inflation rates in many countries around the world. Governments have reacted with an inevitable increase to interest rates to try and offer some form of counterbalance to rising costs in an effort to stymy localised, and more widespread, economic recessions.

簡介

最近在Re Klimvest plc [2022] EWHC 596 (Ch) 一案中,英國高等法院(「法院」)基於一個比較罕見的理由頒令將一家上市公司清盤——失去公司基礎(loss of substratum),即公司放棄其主要宗旨和目的。

背景

Klimvest Plc(「該公司」)於2019年1月出售其業務及資產,其後其唯一重大資產為約800萬英鎊的現金儲備。出售資產後,該公司的最大股東Klimt Invest SA(「第一答辯人」)要求該公司動用出售所得款項作出新投資,而非將在清盤中分派予股東。

Eric Duneau先生(「呈請人」)要求根據英國《1986年無力償債法》第122(1)(g) 條頒令該公司清盤,認為由於該公司已失去其目的或基礎,將該公司清盤屬公正公平。第一答辯人反對呈請,辯稱(其中包括)該公司並無失去其目的或基礎,因為該公司在出售資產前實質上已成為一間控股投資公司,公司的目的仍可透過該投資實現。

失去公司基礎的測試

Introduction

In the recent case of Re Klimvest plc [2022] EWHC 596 (Ch), the English High Court (”Court”) ordered the winding up of a public company on a relatively uncommon ground - loss of substratum, i.e. – the abandonment of a company’s main object and purpose.

Background

简介

最近在Re Klimvest plc [2022] EWHC 596 (Ch) 一案中,英国高等法院(「法院」)基于一个比较罕见的理由颁令将一家上市公司清盘——失去公司基础(loss of substratum),即公司放弃其主要宗旨和目的。

背景

Klimvest Plc(「该公司」)于2019年1月出售其业务及资产,其后其唯一重大资产为约800万英镑的现金储备。出售资产后,该公司的最大股东Klimt Invest SA(「第一答辩人」)要求该公司动用出售所得款项作出新投资,而非将在清盘中分派予股东。

Eric Duneau先生(「呈请人」)要求根据英国《1986年无力偿债法》第122(1)(g) 条颁令该公司清盘,认为由于该公司已失去其目的或基础,将该公司清盘属公正公平。第一答辩人反对呈请,辩称(其中包括)该公司并无失去其目的或基础,因为该公司在出售资产前实质上已成为一间控股投资公司,公司的目的仍可透过该投资实现。

失去公司基础的测试

The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal has recently delivered helpful clarification on the principles which apply with respect to security for costs when the official liquidators of an insolvent fund seek to bring claims against its former management. Where it is clear to the Court that a defendant was responsible for management decisions immediately before a company entered insolvency, the Court may exercise its discretion, notwithstanding the impecuniosity of the plaintiff company, not to order payment of security for costs.

This article was originally published by ThoughtLeaders4 FIRE.

Introduction

There was a distinct air of positivity and delight to be out and about networking again at the FIRE Starters Global Summit in Dublin. Once again the event was well attended by a wonderful and dynamic group of international professionals from across the advisory spectrum in asset recovery, fraud and insolvency and many new networks were forged over the fun three-day event.

Facts
Decision
Comment


How should liquidators deal with the administrative burden of adjudicating thousands of low-value proof of debts in a liquidation estate, without exhausting the limited assets available in the liquidation estate? The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands recently approved a pragmatic solution.

Facts