In Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC v. Mallinckrodt PLC,¹ the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ruled that a debtor that purchased intellectual property under a prepetition asset purchase agreement could continue to retain and use the property post-confirmation while discharging its obligations to pay any future royalties otherwise owed. The decision highlights the importance of structuring transactions up-front to minimize the consequences of future bankruptcies.

Background

Introduction

In the recent decision of Re Ascentra Holdings Inc.(in Official Liquidation), the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has once again confirmed the significant scope of its sanction jurisdiction in the context of official liquidations under section 110(2) of the Companies Act.

Introduction
Facts
Background
Decision
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Facts
Background
Decision
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Subject matter or participant?
Facts in Madera
Characterisation of petition
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Restructuring petitions
Schemes of arrangement
Comment

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction
Facts
Decision
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Background
Primacy of courts in place of incorporation
Decision
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Background
Facts
Decision
Comment

Introduction