Fulltext Search
Supreme Court offers some financiers protection, creates new risks for others, in its decision on Sun Indalex, LLC v. United Steelworkers

The Supreme Court of Canada, in a decision that has implications for borrowers and lenders alike, particularly where pension funds are involved, has raised some new hurdles for the country’s banks and their business customers and, at the same time, has bolstered protection for lenders of last resort who finance insolvent companies.

The court’s decision in Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v. United Steelworkers, issued earlier this year, addresses critical questions in insolvency law regarding pension funds and DIP financing. 

Canada, Ontario, Banking, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Blaney McMurtry LLP, Debtor, Liquidation, Debtor in possession, United Steelworkers, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
Oakland v Wellswood (Yorkshire) Ltd: EAT decides "pre-pack" sales do not transfer employees under TUPE

The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) has decided that the sale of a business by way of a pre-pack administration[1] did not result in a transfer of employees under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, (TUPE Regulations or TUPE).

TUPE Regulations

United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fasken, Contractual term, Bankruptcy, Employment tribunal, Employment contract, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Subsidiary, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Employment Appeal Tribunal