Fulltext Search
Fifth Circuit Rules on the "Solvent-Debtor Exception" and Make-Whole Premiums

On October 14, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a long-awaited ruling on whether Ultra Petroleum Corp.

USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit Rules on the "Solvent-Debtor Exception" and Make-Whole Premiums

In Short

The Situation: Courts have disagreed over whether a make-whole premium triggered by a borrower's bankruptcy filing must be disallowed as unmatured interest. They have also disputed whether the "solvent-debtor exception" requiring the payment of postpetition interest to unimpaired unsecured creditors of a solvent debtor survived the enactment of the Bankruptcy Code. Finally, courts have split on what rate of postpetition interest unimpaired unsecured creditors of a solvent debtor are entitled to receive.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Fifth Circuit
Divided Ninth Circuit Rules That Unimpaired Unsecured Creditors of a Solvent Debtor May Be Entitled to Post-Petition Interest at Contract or State Default Rates

In Short

The Situation: Bankruptcy courts have split on what rate of post-petition interest unimpaired creditors of a solvent debtor are entitled to receive. Bankruptcy courts have variously ruled that such creditors were entitled to the contractual rate of interest, interest at the federal judgment rate (about the rate on a one-year Treasury bill) as of the bankruptcy petition date, or an equitable rate. Another possibility is that no interest is payable at all.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
Courts in New York and Singapore reach opposite conclusions on the validity of interpleader applications arising out of the OW Bunker bankruptcy

On 7 November 2014, OW Bunker A/S (“OW”), a global supplier and trader of marine fuel, filed for bankruptcy in Denmark. Further bankruptcies of OW subsidiaries and affiliates swiftly followed, including the bankruptcy of certain U.S. and Singapore-based OW entities.

Singapore, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Injunction
Section 2(a)(iii) of the ISDA Master Agreement, similar clauses and insolvency

There have been so many articles written and opinions expressed on the spate of cases on the effect of how netting provisions in over-the-counter ("OTC") derivative contracts work when a counterparty becomes in default, that you would be forgiven for being confused about the current position. Now that the dust has settled (for the time being at least), this article takes stock and seeks to make matters as straightforward as possible.

United Kingdom, USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Over-the-counter (finance), Debt, Foreclosure, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers
US Bankruptcy Court limits ISDA counterparty rights upon a bankruptcy event of default

In re Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Case No. 08-13555 et seq. (JMP)(jointly administered)

In this US decision, the Bankruptcy Court held that the "safe harbour" protections of the US Bankruptcy Code only protect a non-defaulting party's right to liquidate, terminate or accelerate a swap, to offset and to net termination values and payment amounts and to foreclose on collateral, but do not permit the withholding of performance under a swap if the swap is not terminated.

USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Swap (finance), Foreclosure, Withholding tax, Concession (contract), Liquidation, Sunset provision, Default (finance), International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court