In a decision handed down earlier today, in Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited (Receivers and Managers appointed) (in liquidation) [2013] HCA 51, the majority of the High Court upheld the Victorian Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the liquidators of an insolvent landlord can disclaim a lease, thereby extinguishing the tenant’s leasehold interest.
Australia, Victoria, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, King & Wood Mallesons, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Interest, Liquidator (law), Victoria Supreme Court
Reversing both the bankruptcy court and the district court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that a trademark licensing agreement had been substantially performed and was therefore not subject to rejection under §365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. In re Exide Technologies, Case No. 08-1872 (3d Cir., June 1, 2010) (Roth, J.) (Ambro, J., concurring).
USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, McDermott Will & Emery, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Liability (financial accounting), Concurring opinion, US Congress, US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit