The equitable doctrine of marshalling can protect the security interests of subordinate secured creditors when a debtor becomes insolvent.
Marshalling is a neglected tool in the insolvency toolbox, but it can play an important role in protecting the security interests of subordinate secured creditors.
The UK Supreme Court, which is the UK's highest court, has handed down its long-awaited decision in Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc [2011] UKSC 38, in which the Court considered the validity and enforceability of so-called "flip" clauses under English bankruptcy law.
United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Clayton Utz, Bankruptcy, Surety, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Swap (finance), Good faith, Default (finance), Credit default swap, Lehman Brothers, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice (England & Wales), UK Supreme Court