The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held that section 1129(a)(10) of the Bankruptcy Code – a provision which, in effect, prohibits confirmation of a plan unless the plan has been accepted by at least one impaired class of claims – applies on “per plan” rather than a “per debtor” basis, even when the plan at issue covers multiple debtors. In re Transwest Resort Properties, Inc., 2018 WL 615431 (9th Cir. Jan. 25, 2018). The Court is the first circuit court to address the issue.
USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Ninth Circuit
The Bottom Line:
USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Illinois
The Bottom Line:
USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Liquidation, Collateralized debt obligation, Bank of New York Mellon, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of New Jersey