The importance of notifications to potential defendants and directors of the insolvent company
The decision in Re Octaviar Administration Pty Ltd (in liq) [2013] NSWSC 786 highlights two key issues for insolvency practitioners:
On June 23, 2011, the US Supreme Court issued a narrowly-divided decision in Stern v. Marshall, limiting Bankruptcy Court jurisdiction over certain types of claims. The Court found that while the Bankruptcy Court was statutorily authorized to enter final judgment on a tortious interference counterclaim (as a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C)), it was not constitutionally authorized to do so.
USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Latham & Watkins LLP, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Tortious interference, Standard of review, Constitutionality, US Constitution, Article III US Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court