Fulltext Search
Gogetta security, but no priority: The importance of a lender’s conduct in determining who has the better equity

This week’s TGIF considers Gogetta Equipment Funding Pty Ltd v Mark & Liz Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 91, which examined a priority contest between competing equitable interests in property.

What happened?

Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Left in the dark - Seeking to appoint a voluntary administrator when Board relations crumble

This week’s TGIF considers the case ofIn the matter of Bean and Sprout Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 351, an application seeking a declaration as to the validity of the appointment of a voluntary administrator.

What happened?

On 7 December 2018, Mr Kong Yao Chin (Chin) was purportedly appointed as the voluntary administrator of Bean and Sprout Pty Ltd (Company) by a resolution of the Company.

Australia, New South Wales, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Board of directors, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), New South Wales Supreme Court
Re Run of Re Amerind - Part 2: Circulating Security Interests and Circulating Assets

This week’s TGIF is the second of a two-part series considering Commonwealth v Byrnes [2018] VSCA 41, the Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision on appeal from last year’s Re Amerind decision about the insolvency of corporate trustees.

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Has new NSW insurance legislation created more problems than it has solved for claimants, creditors and insolvency practitioners?

In June 2017, the New South Wales Parliament introduced the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW Act), designed to clarify the rights of claimants to proceed directly against insurance companies. But in the context of insolvent corporations, has it created more problems than it has solved?

Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
Delay not a bar to obtaining freezing injunction

The High Court has granted three insolvent Cayman companies (each in liquidation) a worldwide freezing order in support of proceedings against Mr Terrill, an individual who operated behind the companies' respective corporate directors as their sole director and shareholder.  The court exercised its discretion to grant the injunction despite there being a delay of more than a year between the discovery of suspicious transactions linked to Mr Terrill and a Letter of Request applying for a freezing order being sent by the Cayman court together with the companies' liquidators to the Englis

Cayman Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, RPC
Electronic disclosure – the perils of ignoring disclosure requirements

In Smailes and another v McNally and another[i]the High Court refused the claimant's application for relief from sanctions, finding the claimant's failure in respect of its disclosure obligations under the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR 31) amounted to a significant and serious breach of an "unless order".

United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, RPC, Civil Procedure Rules (UK)