Fulltext Search

In a judgment issued yesterday (Francis v Gross [2024] NZCA 528), the Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the controversial High Court decision in Francis v Gross [2023] NZHC 1107 and held that purchasers of partly constructed modular buildings (pods) did not have equitable liens (at all, and especially not in priority to secured creditors) over those pods.

在全球市場資金成本不斷增加的背景下,過去12個月許多開曼群島上市公司已成功採取協商一致的重組措施,以管理其債務水平、現金流和融資需求。

開曼群島《公司法》中的工具,提供了快速且具成本效益的公司重組方式;《2024年公司(修訂)法案》將提出修訂,增強開曼群島金融服務產品,令這些工具今年將進一步簡化。

有爭議的重組

2022年8月31日,開曼群島引入備受期待的重組制度改革(重組修正案),使債務人公司能夠以已經或可能無法償還債務並打算向債權人提出妥協或安排,向法院請求委任重組官。

儘管重組修正案為債權人和債務人公司帶來了許多好處,但推出之際恰逢2008年金融危機以來全球央行最大幅度加息。

英國的利率從2021年12月的0.1%升至2023年8月的5.25%,而美聯儲亦將利率從2022年3月的0-0.25%上調至2023年7月的5.25-5.5% (parliament. uk)。因此,債務重組通常所需的資金成本使許多陷入困境的全球企業無法承受外部融資。

A Court-approved reduction of capital is one of the corporate reorganisation tools that has been successfully deployed by listed companies domiciled in the Cayman Islands in order to manage debt and liquidity.

This morning, after much anticipation, the Supreme Court has released its judgment in Yan v Mainzeal Property Construction Limited (in liq) [2023] NZSC 113, largely upholding the Court of Appeal's decision, and awarding damages of $39.8m against the directors collectively, with specified limits for certain directors. The decision signals that a strong emphasis on 'creditor protection' is now embedded in New Zealand company law.

In recent years much ink has been spilled opining on the so called 'Quincecare' duty of care, and the limits of it (see links to our recent insolvency law updates covering the topic below). The judgment in Barclays Bank plc v Quincecare Ltd [1992] 4 All ER 363 was a first instance decision on Steyn J, in which he found that a bank has a duty not to execute a payment instruction given by an agent of its customer without making inquiries if the bank has reasonable grounds for believing that the agent is attempting to defraud the customer.

The United Kingdom Supreme Court has just released an important insolvency judgment in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 (Sequana), which concerns when and the extent to which directors of a company must consider the interests of creditors.

The United Kingdom Supreme Court has just released an important insolvency judgment in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 (Sequana), which concerns when and the extent to which directors of a company must consider the interests of creditors.