Fulltext Search
First Circuit Holds that Fifth Amendment Takings Claims Must be Paid in Full

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently ruled in the Puerto Rico bankruptcy case that Fifth Amendment takings claims cannot be discharged or impaired by a bankruptcy plan. As a matter of first impression in that circuit, the Court disagreed with the Ninth Circuit and held that former property owners affected by prepetition takings must be paid in full.

In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd., 41 F.4th 29 (1st Cir. 2022)

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
Walking in empty shoes: Fifth Circuit allows excess carrier’s contractual subrogation claim despite purported assignment of insured’s rights to a third-party claimant

Where an insured has assigned away its rights to recover available insurance, the insured’s “empty shoes” do not necessarily prevent an excess carrier that pays defense costs rightfully owed by primary carriers from pursuing the primary carriers based a contractual subrogation theory.  An excess carrier proceeding on this basis typically “stands in the shoes of the insured,” obtaining only those rights held by the insured.  Nonetheless, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found last week that where an excess carrier picks up the bill for an insured’s defense, it may recover fr

USA, California, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Duane Morris LLP, Bankruptcy, Fifth Circuit