Fulltext Search
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Doesn't Prevent Certain Bankruptcy Court Decisions

In an opinion issued on Sept. 20 by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico, Judge David T. Thuma held that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not prevent a bankruptcy court from determining whether the automatic stay applies to pending state court litigation. See In re Shook, Case No. 24-10724-t7 (Bankr. N.M. Sept. 20, 2024) [ECF No. 54].

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
Umsatzsteuerliche Besonderheiten im Insolvenzverfahren

Nachfolgend wird die Einordnung der Umsatzsteuer in der Insolvenz als Masse- oder Insolvenzforderung und die Auswirkung auf die Gläubigerbefriedigung erläutert.

European Union, Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, CMS Germany
Ablauf des Restrukturierungsverfahrens nach StaRUG

Das StaRUG gibt Unternehmen die Möglichkeit, sich frühzeitig, im Rahmen eines geordneten Verfahrens und außerhalb eines Insolvenzverfahrens, zu sanieren.

Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, CMS Germany
Pflichten in der Krise - Gläubiger- vor Gesellschafterinteressen?

Muss die Geschäftsführung in der Krise die Belange der Gläubiger stets vorrangig vor den Gesellschafterinteressen („shift of fiduciary duties“) behandeln?

European Union, Germany, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
Fifth Circuit Holds that Post-Judgment Interest is Required in Adversary Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a)

In Matter of Imperial Petroleum Recovery Corp., 84 F.4th 264 (5th Cir. 2023), the Fifth Circuit was asked to address whether 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) – the federal statute providing for post-judgment interest – applies in adversary proceedings even though 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) doesn’t explicitly refer to bankruptcy courts.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Sonderkündigungsrecht nach § 111 InsO bei Erwerb von Anteilen an Immobiliengesellschaft?

Hat ein Erwerber von Geschäftsanteilen an einer Immobiliengesellschaft ein Sonderkündigungsrecht für bestehende Miet- oder Pachtverhältnisse?

European Union, Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, CMS Germany
Will the Supreme Court Grant Cert to Address the Issue of the Appropriate Post-Siegel Remedy? Unlikely.

In earlier posts, the Red Zone has discussed the Supreme Court’s ruling in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 142 S. Ct. 1770 (2022), which held that increased U.S.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
Fifth Circuit Hold that Courts May Bypass Equitable Mootness to Rule on the Merits of Appeal

In Matter of Texxon Petrochemicals, L.L.C., 67 F.4th 259 (5th Cir. 2023), the Fifth Circuit held that even if an appeal is equitably moot, the appellate court nonetheless has appellate jurisdiction to consider the merits of the appeal, without reaching the issue of equitable mootness.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Does Electricity Supplied Within 20 Days of a Bankruptcy Qualify for Section 503(b)(9) Priority Status? Recent Decisions Say “No”

Section 503(b)(9) Overview

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
Fifth Circuit Holds that Section 363(m)’s “Good Faith Purchaser” Protection Applies to Secured Creditor that Used “Economic Leverage” in Connection with Credit Bid for Assets

On April 17, 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Matter of RE Palm Springs II, L.L.C., 2023 WL 2966520 (5th Cir. April 17, 2023), held that a senior lender who uses economic leverage and asserts its legal rights to squeeze out a junior lender remains a good faith purchaser entitled to declare an appeal moot based on a sale under section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code. Key to the Fifth Circuit’s opinion was the fact that the actions in question were disclosed to the bankruptcy court in advance of it making the section 363(m) finding.

Facts

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Coronavirus