Fulltext Search
Not Every Vote Matters: Non-Arm’s Length Parties During Proposals Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act

FT ENE Canada Inc. (“FECI”) was in the nanofibre business, and was a wholly owned subsidiary of Finetex ENE Inc. (“Finetex”). As a result of insolvency difficulties separate and apart from the Canadian business, Finetex was engaged in bankruptcy proceedings in Korea (its home jurisdiction). There was animosity between Finetex and the director of FECI.

Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Debtor
Ignorance May Not be Bliss, but it can be Beneficial: Evidence of the Conduct of a Judgment Creditor Can be used in Certain Circumstances to Engage Section 178(1)(d) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Protect a Judgment from an Order of Discharge

The Defendant was a dentist who had executed a personal guarantee on July 7, 2011 in favour of the Plaintiff (the "Bank") in order to secure payment of the indebtedness of the Defendant's professional corporation. The Bank made a demand for payment on the guarantee, and subsequently brought an action against the Defendant (the "First Action").The Bank was successful on a motion for summary judgment and judgment was granted against the Defendant.

Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
KEIP-ing the Right People for the Job: Ontario Superior Court Outlined the Factors it Will Take into Consideration when Approving Key Employee Retention Plans and Key Employee Incentive Plans

Aralez Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("AP Inc.") and Aralez Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. ("APC Inc.") (collectively, the "Applicants") brought an application to the Ontario Superior Court under the CCAA concurrently with a United States Chapter 11 proceeding brought by affiliated entities. the Applicants. desired a managed liquidation process.

The Applicants entered into three stalking horse agreements for approximately $240 million. This compared to the secured claim of $275 million of the major secured creditors of the Applicants.

Canada, USA, Ontario, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Tipping the Scales: Ontario Court of Appeal Confirms the Primacy of Creditors’ Interests when Approving a Receiver’s Sale of Property

One of the most delicate balancing acts that the Courts are asked to perform in Canada is balancing all of the disparate and competing interests in an insolvency process. The Ontario Court of Appeal was asked to review one iteration of this balancing act in Reciprocal Opportunities Incorporated v.

Canada, Ontario, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Royal Bank of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
Super-priority claims for professional services related to restructuring plans and debt restructuring agreements?

With two decisions (No. 1895/2018 and No. 1896/2018), both filed on 25 January 2018, the Court of Cassation reached opposite conclusions in the two different situations

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Debt restructuring, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
De facto partnerships can be declared bankrupt even if partners are corporations

The Constitutional Court (6 December 2017) confirmed that Art. 147, para. 5, of the Italian Bankruptcy Law does not violate the Constitution as long as it is interpreted in a broad sense

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
Contracts remain in force in amministrazione straordinaria even after they are expired ?

With the decision No. 1195 of 18 January 2018, the Court of Cassation ruled on the powers of the extraordinary commissioner to require performance of pending contracts and on the treatment of the relevant claims of the suppliers

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
King of the Hill: A Priority Dispute between Lien Claimants and Secured Creditors in a Bankruptcy

In Royal Bank of Canada v. A-1 Asphalt Maintenance Ltd. the Court was asked to determine the priority of claims in a bankruptcy between Royal Bank of Canada (the "Bank"), a secured creditor of the bankrupt, A-1 Asphalt Maintenance Ltd. ("A-1") and The Guarantee Company of North America (the "GCNA") a bond company that paid out 20 lien claims and was subrogated to those rights under the Construction Lien Act ("CLA").

Canada, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Royal Bank of Canada, KPMG, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
The bankruptcy receiver can continue utilities contracts, but is not bound to pay in full previous claims based on such contracts

The Court of Cassation with a decision of 25 September 2017, No. 22274 confirms that Art. 74 of the Italian Bankruptcy Law provides a special rule, which does not apply to cases to which it is not explicitly extended

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
Claw-back of a corporate spin-off (Art. 2506 of the Italian Civil Code)?

With the decision No. 1649 of 19 September 2017 the Court of Appeals of Catania followed the interpretation according to which a spin-off is not subject to the avoiding powers of a bankruptcy receiver

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Liquidation