Fulltext Search
New York Bankruptcy Court: Lockup Provision in Proposed Settlement Agreement Violated Bankruptcy Code's Disclosure and Solicitation Requirements

A bedrock principle underlying chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code is that creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders should be provided with adequate information to make an informed decision to either accept or reject a chapter 11 plan. For this reason, the Bankruptcy Code provides that any "solicitation" of votes for or against a plan must be preceded or accompanied by stakeholders' receipt of a "disclosure statement" approved by the bankruptcy court explaining the background of the case as well as the key provisions of the chapter 11 plan.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Appellate Protection of Bankruptcy Property Sale Is Subject to Waiver and Estoppel

In Short

The Situation: The U.S. Supreme Court considered whether § 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code, which limits a party's ability to undo an asset transfer made to a good-faith purchaser in a bankruptcy case, is jurisdictional.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
Default Under Assumed Lease Need Not Be Material or Ongoing to Trigger Landlord's Entitlement to Adequate Assurance of Future Performance

The ability of a bankruptcy trustee or chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") to assume, assume and assign, or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases is an important tool designed to promote a "fresh start" for debtors and to maximize the value of the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of all stakeholders. However, the Bankruptcy Code establishes strict requirements for the assumption or assignment of contracts and leases.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Jones Day
Court of Appeal of Ontario: room for constructive trusts in insolvency proceedings

On July 13, 2022, the Court of Appeal for Ontario allowed an appeal from the Order of a bankruptcy judge in Sirius Concrete Inc. (Re), 2022 ONCA 524 (Sirius), which ruled that certain funds paid by a trade creditor formed part of the bankrupt’s estate. The issue on appeal was whether a constructive trust should be imposed over certain funds due to a claim of unjust enrichment arising from alleged fraudulent misrepresentations made by the bankrupt on the eve of its bankruptcy filing.

Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Insolvency, Court of Appeal for Ontario
OCA addresses fraudulent transfers under Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act

The recent decision inErnst & Young Inc. v. Aquino, the Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA) analyzed the criteria for establishing voidable transfers at undervalue under section 96 of theBankruptcy and Insolvency Act RSC 1985, c B-3 (BIA), with a particular focus on the application of “corporate attribution” in the context of insolvency.

Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Court of Appeal for Ontario
Decisions on secured lenders’ rights and remedies in 2022

As Canada prepares to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, factors such as the elimination of government pandemic support and rising interest rates may significantly affect lenders’ decisions in 2022. Many expect that withdrawal of government funding will create a wave of insolvency filings in Canada. Although there remains significant uncertainty, secured lenders may be comforted by recent court decisions across Canada that have affirmed lenders’ rights and remedies in cases of default. This article summarizes these recent decisions and offers implications for lenders going forward.

Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Coronavirus, British Columbia Supreme Court, British Columbia Court of Appeal
In Brief: U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of High-Profile Bankruptcy Rulings

Madoff

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit
Jurisdiction and broad discretion of insolvency court upheld

On June 17, 2021, the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) dismissed two companion appeals in the receivership proceedings of Accel Canada Holdings Limited (Holdings) and Accel Energy Canada Limited (Energy and together with Holdings, Accel).

Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Court of Appeal of Alberta
U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of Landmark Tribune Safe Harbor Ruling

On April 19, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal of a landmark 2019 decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the applicability of the Bankruptcy Code's safe harbor for certain securities, commodity, or forward contract payments to prevent the avoidance in bankruptcy of $8.3 billion in payments made to the shareholders of Tribune Co. as part of its 2007 leveraged buyout ("LBO").

USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Safe harbor (law), Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit
Court of Appeal of Alberta dismisses application for leave in Bellatrix CCAA proceedings

The Court of Appeal of Alberta issued the latest decision in the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings of Bellatrix Exploration Ltd. (Bellatrix).1

Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Court of Appeal of Alberta