Fulltext Search
New York Bankruptcy Court: Lockup Provision in Proposed Settlement Agreement Violated Bankruptcy Code's Disclosure and Solicitation Requirements

A bedrock principle underlying chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code is that creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders should be provided with adequate information to make an informed decision to either accept or reject a chapter 11 plan. For this reason, the Bankruptcy Code provides that any "solicitation" of votes for or against a plan must be preceded or accompanied by stakeholders' receipt of a "disclosure statement" approved by the bankruptcy court explaining the background of the case as well as the key provisions of the chapter 11 plan.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy
Circuit Split: Eleventh Circuit and Second Circuit Disagree on Eligibility Requirements for Chapter 15 Debtors

Courts disagree over whether a foreign bankruptcy case can be recognized under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code if the foreign debtor does not reside or have assets or a place of business in the United States. In 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit staked out its position on this issue in Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP v. Barnet (In re Barnet), 737 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2013), ruling that the provision of the Bankruptcy Code requiring U.S. residency, assets, or a place of business applies in chapter 15 cases as well as cases filed under other chapters.

Global, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Cross-border insolvency, Supreme Court of the United States, Eleventh Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals
Cayman Islands Branch of FDIC-Insured U.S. Bank Ineligible for Chapter 15 Relief

The Bankruptcy Code bars certain individuals or entities from filing for bankruptcy protection, generally because they do not reside or have a place of business or property in the United States, fail to satisfy certain debt thresholds, or are business entities, such as banks and insurance companies, subject to non-bankruptcy rules or regulations governing their rehabilitation or liquidation.

Global, USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Silicon Valley Bank, Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act 1989 (USA)
Delaware Bankruptcy Court: "Center of Main Interests" for Purposes of Chapter 15 Recognition Must Be Determined on Debtor-by-Debtor Rather than Enterprise Group Basis

Determining a foreign debtor's "center of main interests" ("COMI") for purposes of recognizing a foreign bankruptcy proceeding in the United States under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code can be problematic in cases involving multiple debtors that are members of an enterprise group doing business in several different countries. The U.S.

Global, USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA)
Third Circuit Updates Its Standard for Granting Comity to Foreign Bankruptcy Proceedings

"Comity" is a principle of jurisprudence whereby, under appropriate circumstances, one country recognizes within its borders the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation. Many recent court rulings have examined the indispensable role of comity in the context of foreign bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings that have been "recognized" by U.S. courts during the two decades since the enactment of chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code. However, U.S.

Global, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Barclays, Silicon Valley Bank, Third Circuit
New York Bankruptcy Court: Foreign Representative in Chapter 15 Case Need Not Be Appointed by Foreign Court

In most cases seeking recognition of a foreign bankruptcy proceeding in the United States under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, the foreign debtor's "foreign representative" has been appointed by the foreign court or administrative body overseeing the debtor's bankruptcy case.

Global, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Power of attorney
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Appellate Protection of Bankruptcy Property Sale Is Subject to Waiver and Estoppel

In Short

The Situation: The U.S. Supreme Court considered whether § 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code, which limits a party's ability to undo an asset transfer made to a good-faith purchaser in a bankruptcy case, is jurisdictional.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
Default Under Assumed Lease Need Not Be Material or Ongoing to Trigger Landlord's Entitlement to Adequate Assurance of Future Performance

The ability of a bankruptcy trustee or chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") to assume, assume and assign, or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases is an important tool designed to promote a "fresh start" for debtors and to maximize the value of the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of all stakeholders. However, the Bankruptcy Code establishes strict requirements for the assumption or assignment of contracts and leases.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Jones Day
In Brief: U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of High-Profile Bankruptcy Rulings

Madoff

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of Landmark Tribune Safe Harbor Ruling

On April 19, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal of a landmark 2019 decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the applicability of the Bankruptcy Code's safe harbor for certain securities, commodity, or forward contract payments to prevent the avoidance in bankruptcy of $8.3 billion in payments made to the shareholders of Tribune Co. as part of its 2007 leveraged buyout ("LBO").

USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Safe harbor (law), Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit