Fulltext Search
Fifth Circuit Rules on the "Solvent-Debtor Exception" and Make-Whole Premiums

On October 14, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a long-awaited ruling on whether Ultra Petroleum Corp.

USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit Rules on the "Solvent-Debtor Exception" and Make-Whole Premiums

In Short

The Situation: Courts have disagreed over whether a make-whole premium triggered by a borrower's bankruptcy filing must be disallowed as unmatured interest. They have also disputed whether the "solvent-debtor exception" requiring the payment of postpetition interest to unimpaired unsecured creditors of a solvent debtor survived the enactment of the Bankruptcy Code. Finally, courts have split on what rate of postpetition interest unimpaired unsecured creditors of a solvent debtor are entitled to receive.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Fifth Circuit
Divided Ninth Circuit Rules That Unimpaired Unsecured Creditors of a Solvent Debtor May Be Entitled to Post-Petition Interest at Contract or State Default Rates

In Short

The Situation: Bankruptcy courts have split on what rate of post-petition interest unimpaired creditors of a solvent debtor are entitled to receive. Bankruptcy courts have variously ruled that such creditors were entitled to the contractual rate of interest, interest at the federal judgment rate (about the rate on a one-year Treasury bill) as of the bankruptcy petition date, or an equitable rate. Another possibility is that no interest is payable at all.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
Indalex pension decision considered by Ontario Court of Appeal

Following the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Sun Indalex Finance, LLC v. United Steelworkers, [2013] 1 S.C.R. 271 (Indalex), creditors and their advisors have been closely following jurisprudence which considers the scope of the decision.

Canada, Ontario, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Liquidation, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
Indalex – priorities and pension deficiencies

On Friday, February 1, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released its highly anticipated decision in Indalex Limited (Re).  The ruling stemmed from an appeal of an Ontario Court of Appeal decision that had created commercial uncertainty for financing transactions.  The primary issue for lenders was a priority dispute between a court ordered super-priority charge granted to a lender that had provided “debtor-in-possession” (DIP) financing under the Compan

Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Liquidation, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
Ontario Commercial Court rules proceeds of bia preference action subject to rights of secured creditors

On August 18, 2011, Mr. Justice Morawetz, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, released an important decision in regard to preference actions in the matter of Tucker v. Aero Inventory (UK) Limited (together with Aero Inventory plc, Aero).

Background

Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Personal property, Legal burden of proof, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Ontario Superior Court of Justice