Fulltext Search
Courts Begin to Wrestle with the Impact of City of Chicago, Illinois v. Fulton on a Debtor’s Ability to Recover Estate Property

Courts Begin to Wrestle with the Impact of on a Debtor’s Ability to Recover Estate Property

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
No Time Runs against the King (IRS): The Golden Creditor Rule and its Discontents

Executive Summary

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA), Supreme Court of the United States
What’s Done is Done: Third Circuit Upholds Equitable Mootness and Rules Out Possibility of Individualized Relief for Timely Objecting Party

Bankruptcy courts often dismiss appeals of chapter 11 plans when granting the relief requested in the appeal would undermine the finality and reliability of the corresponding plans, a doctrine known as Equitable Mootness. Over the past several years, certain circuits criticized the doctrine for its lack of statutory basis and effect of avoiding review on the merits.1

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
Supreme Court Holds That a Non-Debtor Retaining a Debtor’s Property Does Not Exercise Control Over the Property in Violation of the Automatic Stay

In January 2020, we analyzed a split among the Circuit Courts regarding whether a non-debtor holding a debtor’s property on the petition date has an affirmative obligation under section 362(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code to return that property to the debtor immediately following the filing of the bankruptcy petition.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
Law of the Case Doctrine in Bankruptcy

When a court reaches a decision in a case, the law of the case doctrine generally provides that parties should not be able to relitigate the same issue in that case, and for the court to adhere to its prior decision.1 The doctrine does not, however, apply to every decision a court reaches. Two recent decisions by Judge Elizabeth Stong in the Brizinova chapter 7 cases in the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York explore when the doctrine may or may not apply in bankruptcy cases.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Super-priority claims for professional services related to restructuring plans and debt restructuring agreements?

With two decisions (No. 1895/2018 and No. 1896/2018), both filed on 25 January 2018, the Court of Cassation reached opposite conclusions in the two different situations

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Debt restructuring, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
De facto partnerships can be declared bankrupt even if partners are corporations

The Constitutional Court (6 December 2017) confirmed that Art. 147, para. 5, of the Italian Bankruptcy Law does not violate the Constitution as long as it is interpreted in a broad sense

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
Contracts remain in force in amministrazione straordinaria even after they are expired ?

With the decision No. 1195 of 18 January 2018, the Court of Cassation ruled on the powers of the extraordinary commissioner to require performance of pending contracts and on the treatment of the relevant claims of the suppliers

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
The bankruptcy receiver can continue utilities contracts, but is not bound to pay in full previous claims based on such contracts

The Court of Cassation with a decision of 25 September 2017, No. 22274 confirms that Art. 74 of the Italian Bankruptcy Law provides a special rule, which does not apply to cases to which it is not explicitly extended

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
Claw-back of a corporate spin-off (Art. 2506 of the Italian Civil Code)?

With the decision No. 1649 of 19 September 2017 the Court of Appeals of Catania followed the interpretation according to which a spin-off is not subject to the avoiding powers of a bankruptcy receiver

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Liquidation