In the recent case of Dwyer & Ors and Davies & Ors v Chicago Boot Co Pty Ltd [2011] SASC 27, Chicago Boot claimed that certain payments made to it by two insolvent companies were not unfair preference payments, because of, amongst other defences, the purported application of a retention of title clause in relation to the supply of goods by Chicago Boot.
Australia, South Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Debt, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Title retention clause, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Supreme Court of the United States
Background
United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Costs in English law, Abuse of process, Solicitor, Debt, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Honda, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Mediation, Cryptocurrency, Cladding, Non-fungible tokens, Insolvency, American Bankruptcy Institute, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Pensions Act 2004 (UK), Building Safety Act 2022 (UK)